Abstract:In recent years, with the rapid development of computing technology, developing parallel procedures to solve large-scale ranking and selection (R&S) problems has attracted a lot of research attention. In this paper, we take fixed-budget R&S procedure as an example to investigate potential issues of developing parallel procedures. We argue that to measure the performance of a fixed-budget R&S procedure in solving large-scale problems, it is important to quantify the minimal growth rate of the total sampling budget such that as the number of alternatives increases, the probability of correct selection (PCS) would not decrease to zero. We call such a growth rate of the total sampling budget the rate for maintaining correct selection (RMCS). We show that a tight lower bound for the RMCS of a broad class of existing fixed-budget procedures is in the order of [Formula: see text], where k is the number of alternatives. Then, we propose a new type of fixed-budget procedure, namely the fixed-budget knockout-tournament ([Formula: see text]) procedure. We prove that, in terms of the RMCS, our procedure outperforms existing fixed-budget procedures and achieves the optimal order, that is, the order of k. Moreover, we demonstrate that our procedure can be easily implemented in parallel computing environments with almost no nonparallelizable calculations. Last, a comprehensive numerical study shows that our procedure is indeed suitable for solving large-scale problems in parallel computing environments. History: Accepted by Bruno Tuffin, Area Editor for Simulation. Funding: Y. Zhong was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72101047]. L. J. Hong was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72091211 and 72161160340]. G. Jiang was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72121001 and 72171060]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1221 .

Algorithm for Calculating the Initial Sample Size in a Fully Sequential Ranking and Selection Procedure

Adaptive Sampling Rule for Ranking-and-Selection Problem

Adaptive Fully Sequential Selection Procedures with Linear and Nonlinear Control Variates

Combined Variance Reduction Techniques in Fully Sequential Selection Procedures

An Indifference-Zone Selection Procedure with Minimum Switching and Sequential Sampling

The (surprising) Sample Optimality of Greedy Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking and Selection

Solving Large-Scale Fixed-Budget Ranking and Selection Problems

Knockout-Tournament Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking and Selection in Parallel Computing Environments

On the finite-sample statistical validity of adaptive fully sequential procedures

Ranking and Selection with Two-Stage Decision

Speeding Up Pairwise Comparisons for Large Scale Ranking and Selection

Fully Sequential Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking-and-Selection Problems in Parallel Computing Environments

A rank method for testing perfect ranking in multi-cycle ranked set sampling

Non-Myopic Knowledge Gradient Policy for Ranking and Selection.

Data-driven Ranking and Selection under Input Uncertainty

Optimal Computing Budget Allocation for Data-driven Ranking and Selection

Sample-Optimal Large-Scale Optimal Subset Selection

Sequential sampling for a ranking and selection problem with exponential sampling distributions

A New Framework of Designing Sequential Ranking-and-selection Procedures.

Series Expansion of Probability of Correct Selection for Improved Finite Budget Allocation in Ranking and Selection

A REVIEW OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION FOR RANKING AND SELECTION