Abstract:In recent years, with the rapid development of computing technology, developing parallel procedures to solve large-scale ranking and selection (R&S) problems has attracted a lot of research attention. In this paper, we take fixed-budget R&S procedure as an example to investigate potential issues of developing parallel procedures. We argue that to measure the performance of a fixed-budget R&S procedure in solving large-scale problems, it is important to quantify the minimal growth rate of the total sampling budget such that as the number of alternatives increases, the probability of correct selection (PCS) would not decrease to zero. We call such a growth rate of the total sampling budget the rate for maintaining correct selection (RMCS). We show that a tight lower bound for the RMCS of a broad class of existing fixed-budget procedures is in the order of [Formula: see text], where k is the number of alternatives. Then, we propose a new type of fixed-budget procedure, namely the fixed-budget knockout-tournament ([Formula: see text]) procedure. We prove that, in terms of the RMCS, our procedure outperforms existing fixed-budget procedures and achieves the optimal order, that is, the order of k. Moreover, we demonstrate that our procedure can be easily implemented in parallel computing environments with almost no nonparallelizable calculations. Last, a comprehensive numerical study shows that our procedure is indeed suitable for solving large-scale problems in parallel computing environments. History: Accepted by Bruno Tuffin, Area Editor for Simulation. Funding: Y. Zhong was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72101047]. L. J. Hong was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72091211 and 72161160340]. G. Jiang was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72121001 and 72171060]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1221 .

An Indifference-Zone Selection Procedure with Minimum Switching and Sequential Sampling

Selecting the Best System when Systems Are Revealed Sequentially

Adaptive Fully Sequential Selection Procedures with Linear and Nonlinear Control Variates

Fully Sequential Indifference‐zone Selection Procedures with Variance‐dependent Sampling

Indifference-Zone-Free Selection of the Best

Data-driven Ranking and Selection under Input Uncertainty

A New Framework of Designing Sequential Ranking-and-selection Procedures.

Combined Variance Reduction Techniques in Fully Sequential Selection Procedures

Ranking and Selection with Two-Stage Decision

Non-Myopic Knowledge Gradient Policy for Ranking and Selection.

On the finite-sample statistical validity of adaptive fully sequential procedures

Optimal Computing Budget Allocation for Data-driven Ranking and Selection

A Rank-Based Sampling Framework for Offline Reinforcement Learning

The (surprising) Sample Optimality of Greedy Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking and Selection

A sequential procedure for neighborhood selection-of-the-best in optimization via simulation

Input Uncertainty and Indifference-Zone Ranking & Selection

A frequentist selection-of-the-best procedure without indifference zone

Solving Large-Scale Fixed-Budget Ranking and Selection Problems

AlphaRank: An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Ranking and Selection Problems

Fully Sequential Ranking and Selection Procedures with PAC Guarantee.

Ranking and Selection with Covariates for Personalized Decision Making