Abstract:Ionizing radiation is an important part of cancer therapy and at the molecular and cellular level it is generally believed that damage to the DNA within the cell nucleus is the major cause of reproductive cell death. This classical view also assumes that the cell killing effect is closely related to the amount of energy deposited in the DNA of the cell traversed by the radiation. In the last decade several newly recognized findings have suggested so-called nontargeted responses where unirradiated cells may respond when their neighbors are irradiated. This phenomenon is generally referred to as the bystander effect and the response in unirradiated cells may include cell killing, genomic instability or delayed death, DNA damage, chromosomal aberrations, altered gene expression or mutations [1]. The term bystander has previously been used in gene therapy where bystander effects are described as when the gene product of a transfected DNA travels from the transfected cell into neighboring cells. Upon radiation-exposure the bystander effect is so far mainly identified using in vitro cell cultures. Mothersill and Seymour [2] found that medium from low-LET irradiated cell cultures could reduce the survival of non-irradiated cells. The effect was cell-type dependent and recognized already at low radiation doses with no further effect at higher doses. Earlier studies with different experimental design showed that high-LET alpha particles induced chromosomal damage in 30% of the cells even if only 1% of the cell population was traversed by an alpha particle [3]. Several other studies have confirmed these results and more recent studies also involve irradiation of tissue explants with a charged particle microbeam [4]. Clearly, these findings challenge the conventional notion that damage to the DNA/genome is only induced by ionizing events in the irradiated cell. A critical question is of course how the bystander effect influences the therapeutic outcome, e.g. its impact on tumor cell killing, normal tissue response, and radiation-induced cancer. Studies on both early and late responses in normal and tumor cells, preferably in vivo or in more complex in vitro models could help to resolve these questions. In this issue of Acta Oncologica, Djordjevic and Lange [5] present experimental indications of a bystander cell killing effect identified when threedimensional spheroids of different constitutions of cell populations are used. In this system, primarily developed to evaluate radiation response of fresh tumor biopsy material without interference from overgrowing normal fibroblasts, they recognize bystander-like responses when mixing test cells with heavily irradiated feeder cells. Thus the presence of irradiated cells in a 3D spheroid co-culture system brings the clonogenicity down. Somewhat surprising, this bystander response was obtained at relatively high doses and it is possible that other factors could influence the response. However, this study pinpoints critical aspects on the use of appropriate in vitro tests of radiation sensitivity, and ultimately, predictive assays for use in tumor therapy. What do we know about the mechanism transferring the signals from an irradiated cell to an unirradiated bystander cells? The results so far implicate extracellular factors that are transferred to bystander cells, either directly via gap junctions between adjacent cells, or indirectly via autocrine or paracrine factors (reviewed in [6]). Clearly the signals and responses are cell-type dependent and irradiation of cells have been found to initiate a bystander response involving cytokines (e.g. tumor necrosis factor a or interleukin 8), reactive oxygen

INCOME INEQUALITY, GLOBALIZATION, AND COUNTRY RISK: A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS

Effects of Country and Geopolitical Risks on Income Inequality: Evidence from Emerging Economies

Study on the Impact of Cross-border Capital Flows on Income Inequality

Impact of Globalization on Income Distribution Inequality in 60 Countries: Comments

The Globalization-Inequality Nexus: A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

THE IMPACTS OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE LABOR SHARE: EVIDENCE FROM ASIA

GLOBALIZATION, LIBERALIZATION AND INCOME INEQUALITY: THE CASE OF CHINA

The effects of globalisation on OECD income inequality : a static and dynamic analysis

Radiation-induced bystander effects

Globalization and spatial inequality: Does economic integration affect regional disparities?

Globalization and Regional Income Inequality in China

Globalization and Regional Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Within China

Globalization and the Labor Share in National Income

Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows

Global Inequality and Global Poverty

Does Capital Account Openness Increase Income Inequality?-Analysis Based on Cross-Country Panel Data

Impact of fintech, mineral resources extraction, and globalization on social inequality: Exploring the role of technology innovation in G10 economies

The Effects of Globalization and Democratization on Inequality in South Korea

Financial Globalization and Wage Inequality

Globalization and Gender Wage Inequality in China

Explaining International and Intertemporal Variations in Income Inequality