Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Youliang Pei,Wanguang Zhang,Zhanguo Zhang,Lei Zhang,Hongping Luo,Xiaoping Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.1830
IF: 3.842
2019-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Introduction: Intracorporeal and extracorporeal Pringle maneuver (PM) are both applied in laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) to minimize blood loss. We used a simplified intracorporeal PM and compared its safety and efficacy with extracorporeal PM in a large volume cohort of LH for hepatocellular carcinoma. Method: Between January 2012 and June 2018, 708 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LH in our center. Of these, 457 patients applied PM (the PM group), and 251 patients didn’t use PM (the non-PM group). Among patients used PM, 166 patients used extracorporeal PM (the EPM group), and 291 patients used a simplified intracorporeal PM (the IPM group). Safety and efficacy of this modified intracorporeal PM were evaluated by comparing the perioperative outcomes. Result: Compared with patients in the non-PM group, patients in the PM had larger tumor size (3.9 vs. 4.5 cm, P<0.001), higher proportion of posterolateral tumor location (4.8% vs. 32.4%, P<0.001) and non-anatomical resection (38.2% vs. 87.5%,P<0.001). Patients in the EPM and IPM group displayed a similar number of clamping session (1.9 vs. 2.0, P=0.495) and clamping time (19.1 vs. 19.9 min, P=0.295). Operative time and intraoperative blood loss were also comparable in the two subgroups. Conversion rate was higher in the EPM group than that in the IPM group but had no statistical difference (10.8% vs. 8.9%, P=0.513). Peak transaminase levels after LH in the PM group were higher than that in the non-PM group, but comparable between the EPM group and the IPM group. Conclusion: PM is most likely performed among patients with large tumor size, posterolateral tumor location, and non-anatomical resection. Both the intracorporeal and extracorporeal PM are effective in hepatic inflow occlusion, but the simplified intracorporeal PM doesn't need an additional trocar or incision and shows no interfere with the visual field and the operation of the laparoscopic instruments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?