Forecasting the equity premium: can machine learning beat the historical average?
Xingfu Xu,Wei-han Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2024.2409278
IF: 1.986
2024-10-16
Quantitative Finance
Abstract:We empirically predict the equity premium with the selected machine learning methods in Gu et al . (Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Rev. Financ. Stud. , 2020, 33 (5), 2223–2273). We also consider four additional popular machine learning methods (ridge regression, support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors, and extreme gradient boosted trees) and their combination method. Using a dataset of both macroeconomic and technical predictors, we find that despite showcasing strong in-sample forecasting abilities, particularly with tree-based models, the out-of-sample results support Welch and Goyal (A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev. Financ. Stud. , 2008, 21 (4), 1455–1508) that the competing forecasting models generally fail to outperform the historical average benchmark. We attribute this failure to the small dataset size and the low signal-to-noise ratio inherent in equity premium prediction. Our variable importance analysis further identifies three bond interest rate-related variables as the most dominant predictors for the equity premium. The economic value from a market timing perspective highlights that the historical average benchmark strategy generates the highest average return of 25.63% and the best Sharpe ratio of 0.8. Finally, our findings are robust across a variety of settings.
economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance