Abstract:Local Differential Privacy (LDP) can provide each user with strong privacy guarantees under untrusted data curators while ensuring accurate statistics derived from privatized data. Due to its powerfulness, LDP has been widely adopted to protect privacy in various tasks (e.g., heavy hitters discovery, probability estimation) and systems (e.g., Google Chrome, Apple iOS). In particular, <math>(∊,δ)</math>-LDP has been studied in related statistical tasks like private learning and hypothesis testing, but is mainly achieved by using Gaussian mechanism, leading to the limited data utility. In this paper, we investigate several novel mechanisms that achieve <math>(∊,δ)</math>-LDP with higher data utility in collecting and analyzing users' data. Specifically, we first design two <math>(∊,δ)</math>-LDP algorithms for mean estimations on multi-dimensional numeric data, which can ensure higher accuracy than the optimal Gaussian mechanism. Then, we investigate different local protocols for frequency estimations on categorical attributes under <math>(∊,δ)</math>-LDP. Based on the proposed mechanisms, we further study on <math>(∊,δ)</math>-LDP-compliant stochastic gradient descent algorithms for machine learning models. Besides, the theoretical analysis of the error bound and the variance of the proposed algorithms are also presented in the paper. We have conducted extensive experiments on both real-world and synthetic datasets and demonstrated the high data utility of our proposed algorithms in the perspectives of simple data statistics tasks and complex machine learning tasks. The experimental results have shown that our proposed algorithms can effectively improve the data utility in different tasks while alleviating the privacy concerns of each individual.

Distributed K-Means Clustering Guaranteeing Local Differential Privacy

Privacy Preserving Distributed DBSCAN Clustering

Differentially Private K-Means Publishing with Distributed Dimensions

k-Means SubClustering: A Differentially Private Algorithm with Improved Clustering Quality

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

Differentially Private k-Means Clustering with Guaranteed Convergence

Differentially private k-center problems

Differentially Private User-based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Based on K-means Clustering

Distributed Clustering in the Anonymized Space with Local Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Privacy-Preserving and Outsourced Multi-User k-Means Clustering

On Learning Cluster Coefficient of Private Networks

FastLloyd: Federated, Accurate, Secure, and Tunable $k$-Means Clustering with Differential Privacy

Differentially Private Vertical Federated Clustering

Privacy-Preserving Distributed Clustering for Electrical Load Profiling.

Differential Privacy-preserving Distributed Machine Learning

Achieving data utility-privacy tradeoff in Internet of Medical Things: A machine learning approach

Distributed, communication-efficient, and differentially private estimation of KL divergence

Utility–Privacy Trade-Off in Distributed Machine Learning Systems

Privacy-Preserving Distributed Clustering for Electrical Load Profiling

PLDP-FL: Federated Learning with Personalized Local Differential Privacy