Abstract:Data sourcesStudies were selected, using appropriate key words, from the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Medline (via Pubmed); Scopus/Elsevier; and Embase. A manual search was also conducted of five periodontology and oral and maxillofacial surgery journals. It was not clarified what proportion of studies included were derived from which source.Study selectionInclusion criteria included prospective studies and randomised controlled trials published in English, with a minimum 6-month follow-up reporting on parameters of periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar following removal of M3M in human subjects. These parameters included pocket probing depth (PPD) reduction and final depth (FD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) reduction and FD, alveolar bone defect (ABD) change and FD. Given prognostic indictors and interventions were investigated, the studies were screened using PICO and PECO (Population, Intervention, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome). Cohen’s kappa statistic measured the level of agreement between 2 selecting authors (0.96 stage 1 screening, 1.00 stage 2 screening). Disagreements were resolved with a tie-breaker 3rd author. Ultimately, from 918 studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria and 14 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were excluded on the basis of same patient pools, non-representative outcomes of interest, insufficient follow-up period, and unclear results.Data extraction and synthesisThe 17 studies meeting the inclusion criteria underwent validity assessment and data extraction, including risk of bias analysis. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate mean difference and standard error for each outcome measure. If these were unavailable, a correlation coefficient was calculated. Meta-regression was used on different subgroups to determine factors affecting periodontal healing. For all analyses, statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. Statistical variability in outcomes beyond the expected was estimated using I2 analyses, with a value >50% indicating significant heterogeneity.ResultsThe periodontal parameters investigated yielded the following results after meta-analysis: overall PPD reduction of 1.06 mm at 6 months and 1.67 mm at 12 months; final PPD of 3.81 mm at 6 months; CAL change of 0.69 mm at 6 months; final CAL of 4.28 mm at 6 months and 4.37 mm at 12 months; ABD reduction of 2.62 mm at 6 months; ABD of 3.2 mm at 6 months. The authors found no statistically significant effect on periodontal healing from the following confounding factors: age; M3M angulation (specifically, mesioangular impaction); optimisation of periodontal health prior to surgery; scaling and root planing of the distal second molar at the time of surgery; post-operative antibiotics or chlorhexidine prophylaxis. There were statistically significant correlations between baseline PPD and final PPD. There was improved PPD reduction at 6 months with a three-sided flap compared to others, and regenerative materials and bone grafts improved all periodontal parameters.ConclusionsAlthough M3M removal results in modest improvement in periodontal health distally of the second mandibular molar, periodontal defects remain onwards of 6 months. There is limited evidence suggesting a three-sided flap is more beneficial than an envelope flap in PPD reduction at 6 months. Regenerative materials and bone grafts result in significant improvements across all periodontal health parameters. The most important predictive factor in final PPD of the distal second mandibular molar is baseline PPD.

Impacts of Non-Impacted Third Molar Removal on the Periodontal Condition of Adjacent Second Molars.

Periodontal status of mandibular second molar after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars- a prospective clinical trial

The impact of maxillary non-impacted third molars on the distal alveolar bone of adjacent teeth using CBCT: a retrospective study.

Influence of periodontal susceptibility on the periodontal healing of adjacent second molars after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar

[Nonimpacted third molars and the periodontal homeostasis of their adjacent second molars]

Relationship between Presence of Third Molars and Prevalence of Periodontal Pathology of Adjacent Second Molars: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effect modifiers influencing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar following mandibular third molar removal

Periodontal status of the adjacent second molar after impacted mandibular third molar surgical extraction

Effect of impacted mandibular third molar extraction on periodontal microbiota and clinical parameters of adjacent teeth: A randomized clinical trial

[Effect of residual dental follicle after removal of impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal health of adjacent second molar]

Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults

Effect of lower third molar extraction with simultaneous scaling on periodontal tissue of the lower second molar

The impact of Anatomic Features of Asymptomatic Third Molars on the Pathologies of Adjacent Second Molars: A Cross-sectional Analysis

The incidence of periodontal defects distal to the maxillary second molar after impacted third molar extraction

Periodontal healing after 'orthodontic extraction' of mandibular third molars: a retrospective cohort study

The association of mandibular third molar impaction with the dental and periodontal lesions in the adjacent second molars.

Is prophylactic extraction of mandibular third molar indicated? A retrospective study.

Effects of Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction on Periodontal Tissue of the Adjacent Second Molar

Effects of Flap Design on the Periodontal Health of Second Lower Molars after Impacted Third Molar Extraction

Is it necessary to remove bone-impacted teeth? A retrospective study

Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing