Analysis of Factors Related to Distal Proximal Caries on the Distal Surface of the Mandibular Second Molar Induced by an Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
Xiang Jin,Xiang-Zi Zhang,Cheng-Ri Jin,Yun-Ze Xuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S320144
IF: 2.145
2021-07-20
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Xiang Jin, Xiang-Zi Zhang, Cheng-Ri Jin, Yun-Ze Xuan Department of Dentistry, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133000, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yun-Ze Xuan Department of Dentistry, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, No. 1327 of Juzi Street, Yanji, Jilin, 133000, People's Republic of China Tel +86 15526770621 Email Objective: To analyze the factors related to distal proximal caries of the mandibular second molar (MSM) induced by an impacted mandibular third molar (MTM). Methods: A total 500 panoramic radiographs of patients with impacted MTMs who were treated in the Department of Stomatology of the Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University between October 2017 and October 2019 were selected. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted, and the diagnosis of caries in the MSM and the position of the MTM were evaluated. Results: The posterior margin space of the MSM was larger in males (13.5 mm) than females (11.1 mm, P < 0.001) and correlated with the MTM's impacted depth and eruption degree ( P < 0.001). The prevalence of distal proximal caries of the MSM was 37.6%, and a χ 2 test showed that age, impacted depth, impacted direction, impacted angle, degree of occurrence, and CEJ distance were correlated with caries in the distal adjacent surface of the MSM ( P < 0.001). Logistic multivariate analysis showed that the impacted depth was at position A or B, the impacted direction was mesioangular, and the impacted angle was < 80°. Distal adjacent caries of MSMs were prone to occur when entirely or partially emergent. CEJ distance was not an independent factor for caries. The severity of caries in an MSM's distal adjacent surface had statistical significance on the impacted depth and impacted angle ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The posterior margin space of the MSM influences the impacted condition of the MTM. Preventive extraction can be considered if the impacted angle is < 80°, especially in the case of a fully or partially emergent MTM at position A or B and mesioangular impacted areas. Keywords: mandibular third molar, dental caries, mandibular second molar, related factors The mandibular third molar (MTM), located at the back end of the dentition, is the most frequently impacted tooth. 1 Tooth impaction is mainly related to the following factors: inadequate space, enlarged crown size, limitation in skeletal growth, and late third molar maturation. 2 Even though impacted third molars could exist permanently without any symptoms, they could also lead to various pathologies and thereby symptoms, such as swelling, loss of bone, pain, pericoronitis, resorption of the roots of adjacent teeth, distal caries, and odontogenic tumors and cysts. 2–4 Of these complications, distal caries is the most common. 5 Due to the abnormal location of a protruded or non-protruded MTM, it can impact food intake and the retention of plaque between the mandibular second molar (MSM), leading to caries in the MSM. 3 Clinically, an impacted MTM makes it difficult to detect distal caries of the MSM by visual examination. In more severe cases, pulpitis and periodontal diseases have even appeared. Therefore, X-rays are also used for diagnosis. Previous studies have found that the rate of dental caries in the MSM caused by MTM inhibition ranged from 1% to 47%; this range was so wide due to differences in the studied regions, the ages of selected populations, oral hygiene habits, and research methods. 6–8 To decide whether a MTM should be removed is likely among the most commonly encountered treatment dilemmas in the dental profession. 1 , 2 The purpose of exploring the risk factors of MTM is to provide a reference for its clinical management. A symptomatic MTM should be removed in a timely manner, but determining preventive extraction of an asymptomatic MTM has always been controversial. At present, there are few studies in China of the correlation between an impacted MTM and MSM distal caries, or the clinical symptoms were evaluated only by comparing the status of eruption, and there is not enough evidence to support guidance for the preventive extraction of an impacted MTM. 9 In addition, the research methods, regions, ethnicities, economies, and cultures studied by various research institutes are different, leading to highly differing results across studies. This highlights the necessity of comprehens -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal