A Comprehensive Study of Hα Emitters at Z ∼ 0.62 in the DAWN Survey: the Need for Deep and Wide Regions

Santosh Harish,Alicia Coughlin,James E. Rhoads,Sangeeta Malhotra,Steven L. Finkelstein,Matthew Stevans,Vithal S. Tilvi,Ali Ahmad Khostovan,Sylvain Veilleux,Junxian Wang,Pascale Hibon,Johnnes Zabl,Bhavin Joshi,John Pharo,Isak Wold,Lucia A. Perez,Zhen-Ya Zheng,Ronald Probst,Rob Swaters,Bahram Mobasher,Tianxing Jiang,Huan Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7015
2020-01-01
Abstract:We present new estimates of the luminosity function (LF) and star formation rate density (SFRD) for an H alpha-selected sample at z similar to 0.62 from the Deep And Wide Narrow-band (DAWN) survey. Our results are based on a new H alpha sample in the extended COSMOS region (compared to Coughlin et al.) with the inclusion of flanking fields, resulting in a total area coverage of similar to 1.5 deg(2). A total of 241 H alpha emitters were selected based on robust selection criteria using spectrophotometric redshifts and broadband color-color classification. Given that dust extinction is a dominant uncertainty in the estimation of LF and SFRD, we explore the effect of different dust-correction prescriptions by calculating the LF and SFRD using a constant dust extinction correction, A(H alpha) = 1 mag, a luminosity-dependent correction, and a stellar-mass-dependent correction. The resulting H alpha LFs are well fitted using Schechter functions with best-fit parameters: L* = 10(42.24) erg s(-1), <italic* = 10(-2.85) Mpc(-3), alpha = -1.62 for constant dust correction, L <i erg s(-1), * = 10(-2.8) Mpc(-3), alpha = -1.39 for luminosity-dependent dust correction, and L* = 10(42.36) erg s(-1), * = 10(-2.91) Mpc(-3), alpha = -1.48, for stellar-mass-dependent dust correction. The deep and wide nature of the DAWN survey effectively samples H alpha emitters over a wide range of luminosities, thereby providing better constraints on both the faint and bright ends of the LF. Also, the SFRD estimates rho(SFR) = 10(-1.39) M yr(-1) Mpc(-3) (constant dust correction), rho(SFR) = 10(-1.47) M yr(-1) Mpc(-3) (luminosity-dependent dust correction), and rho(SFR) = 10(-1.46) M yr(-1) Mpc(-3) (stellar-mass-dependent dust correction) are in good agreement with the evolution of SFRD across redshifts (0 z < 2) seen from previous H alpha surveys.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?