Multiple Emission Lines of Hα Emitters at z ∼ 2.3 from the Broad- and Medium-band Photometry in the ZFOURGE Survey

Nuo Chen,Kentaro Motohara,Lee Spitler,Kimihiko Nakajima,Rieko Momose,Tadayuki Kodama,Masahiro Konishi,Hidenori Takahashi,Kosuke Kushibiki,Yukihiro Kono,Yasunori Terao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20cc
IF: 5.521
2024-03-13
The Astrophysical Journal
Abstract:We present a multiple emission line study of ∼1300 Hα emitters (HAEs) at z ∼ 2.3 in the ZFOURGE survey. In contrast to the traditional spectroscopic method, our sample is selected based on the flux excess in the ZFOURGE K s broadband data relative to the best-fit stellar continuum. Using the same method, we also extract the strong diagnostic emission lines for these individual HAEs: [O iii] λ λ4959, 5007 and [O ii] λ λ3726, 3729. Our measurements demonstrate good consistency with those obtained from spectroscopic surveys. We investigate the relationship between the equivalent widths (EWs) of these emission lines and various galaxy properties, including stellar mass, stellar age, star formation rate, specific star formation rate, and ionization state (O32). We have identified a discrepancy between HAEs at z ∼ 2.3 and typical local star-forming galaxies observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, suggesting the evolution of lower gas-phase metallicity (Z) and higher ionization parameters (U) with redshift. Notably, we have observed a significant number of low-mass HAEs exhibiting exceptionally high EW [O iii] . Their galaxy properties are comparable to those of extreme objects, such as extreme O3 emitters and Lyα emitters at z ≃ 2–3. Considering that these characteristics may indicate potential strong Lyman continuum leakage, higher-redshift analogs of the low-mass HAEs could be significant contributors to the cosmic reionization. Further investigations of this particular population are required to gain a clearer understanding of galaxy evolution and cosmic reionization.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?