Abstract:Smart contracts are becoming appealing targets for hackers because of the vast amount of cryptocurrencies under their control. Asset loss due to the exploitation of smart contract codes has increased significantly in recent years. To guarantee that smart contracts are vulnerability-free, there are many works to detect the vulnerabilities of smart contracts, but only a few vulnerability repair works have been proposed. Repairing smart contract vulnerabilities at the source code level is attractive as it is transparent to users, whereas existing repair tools, such as SCRepair and sGuard , suffer from many limitations: (1) ignoring the code of vulnerability prevention; (2) possibly applying the repair to the wrong statements and changing the original business logic of smart contracts; (3) showing poor performance in terms of time and gas overhead. In this work, we propose machine learning guided rule-based automated vulnerability repair on smart contracts to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of sGuard . To address the limitations mentioned above, we design the features that characterize both the symptoms of vulnerabilities and the methods of vulnerability prevention to learn various vulnerability patterns and reduce false positives. Additionally, a fine-grained localization algorithm is designed by traversing the nodes of the abstract syntax tree, and we refine and extend the repair rules of sGuard to preserve the original business logic of smart contracts and support new vulnerability types. Our tool, named sGuard+ , reduces time overhead based on machine learning models, and reduces gas overhead by fewer code changes and precise patching. In our experiment, we collect a publicly available vulnerability dataset from CVE, SWC and SmartBugs Curated as a ground truth for evaluations. Overall, sGuard+ repairs more vulnerabilities with less time and gas overhead than state-of-the-art tools. Furthermore, we reproduce about 9,000 historical transactions for regression testing. It is shown that sGuard+ has no impact on the original business logic of smart contracts.

MuSC: A Tool for Mutation Testing of Ethereum Smart Contract

Mutation Testing for Ethereum Smart Contract

Automating User Notice Generation for Smart Contract Functions

SuMo: A Mutation Testing Strategy for Solidity Smart Contracts

Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Technique: A Survey

Gas‐centered mutation testing of Ethereum Smart Contracts

MuFuzz: Sequence-Aware Mutation and Seed Mask Guidance for Blockchain Smart Contract Fuzzing

Differential testing solidity compiler through deep contract manipulation and mutation

ConvMHSA-SCVD: Enhancing Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Through a Knowledge-Driven and Data-Driven Framework

sGuard+ : Machine Learning Guided Rule-based Automated Vulnerability Repair on Smart Contracts.

Evaluating Ethereum Reentrancy Detection Tools Via Mutation Testing

Security Reinforcement for Ethereum Virtual Machine

Ethchecker: a context-guided fuzzing for smart contracts

$μ$SE: Mutation-based Evaluation of Security-focused Static Analysis Tools for Android

Metamorphic Testing for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities Detection

Making Smart Contract Development More Secure and Easier.

EVMPatch: Timely and Automated Patching of Ethereum Smart Contracts

SmartBugs: A Framework to Analyze Solidity Smart Contracts

Siguard: Detecting Signature-Related Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts.

Security Threat Mitigation For Smart Contracts: A Comprehensive Survey

MQP: Mutants Quality Prediction for Cost-Effective Mutation Testing