Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

On External Disturbance Rejection Of Linear Adrc

Suppressing High-Frequency External Disturbance in Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Partially Canceling Estimated Total Disturbance.

An Interpretation of Internal Disturbance

Auto Disturbance Rejection Control for Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems

Internal model based active disturbance rejection control

Frequency-Domain Analysis of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control Via the Describing Function Method.

Performance Analysis of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Typical Inertial Process

Active disturbance rejection control:theoretical results summary and future researches

Robust Absolute Stability Analysis for Interval Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Based Control System.

Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for High-Order System

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

A Relay Feedback Method for the Tuning of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers

A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners

Design and Stability Analysis of a Generalized Reduced-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Controller

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

On Linear/Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Switching Control

A Teaching Suggestion for Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Tuning Method for Second-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Closed-Loop Shaping-Based Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Delay Robustness and Application to Wet Desulfurization Process

A Robust Control Methodology Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Input Shaping