Abstract:Social media are used as main discussion channels by millions of individuals every day. The content individuals produce in daily social-media-based micro-communications, and the emotions therein expressed, may impact the emotional states of others. A recent experiment performed on Facebook hypothesized that emotions spread online, even in absence of non-verbal cues typical of in-person interactions, and that individuals are more likely to adopt positive or negative emotions if these are over-expressed in their social network. Experiments of this type, however, raise ethical concerns, as they require massive-scale content manipulation with unknown consequences for the individuals therein involved. Here, we study the dynamics of emotional contagion using a random sample of Twitter users, whose activity (and the stimuli they were exposed to) was observed during a week of September 2014. Rather than manipulating content, we devise a null model that discounts some confounding factors (including the effect of emotional contagion). We measure the emotional valence of content the users are exposed to before posting their own tweets. We determine that on average a negative post follows an over-exposure to 4.34% more negative content than baseline, while positive posts occur after an average over-exposure to 4.50% more positive contents. We highlight the presence of a linear relationship between the average emotional valence of the stimuli users are exposed to, and that of the responses they produce. We also identify two different classes of individuals: highly and scarcely susceptible to emotional contagion. Highly susceptible users are significantly less inclined to adopt negative emotions than the scarcely susceptible ones, but equally likely to adopt positive emotions. In general, the likelihood of adopting positive emotions is much greater than that of negative emotions.

I Can Feel What You Feel: Emotion Exchanges in Twitter Conversations Between Candidates and the Public

The Politics of Twitter: Emotions and the Power of Social Media

Emotional Reactions and the Pulse of Public Opinion: Measuring the Impact of Political Events on the Sentiment of Online Discussions

Identification of Common Trends in Political Speech in Social Media using Sentiment Analysis

The Pulse of Mood Online: Unveiling Emotional Reactions in a Dynamic Social Media Landscape

Not All Emotions Are Created Equal: Expressive Behavior of the Networked Public on China's Social Media Site

On the Challenges of Sentiment Analysis for Dynamic Events

Interplay Between Public Attention and Public Emotion Toward Multiple Social Issues on Twitter

The impact of moral framing in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates on moral judgments and self-transcendent emotions in tweets

Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena

Building Support Through the Personalization of Twitter Messages in a Permanent Campaign

Higher contagion and weaker ties mean anger spreads faster than joy in social media

Emotional Campaigning in Politics: Being Moved and Anger in Political Ads Motivate to Support Candidate and Party

How Similar Are Elected Politicians and Their Constituents? Quantitative Evidence From Online Social Networks

[An epidemiological study of hypercholesterolemia in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg].

Winners and losers: Emotional shifts across elections are conveyed by a politician’s smile

The Emotional Power of Partisan Media: A Computer Vision Analysis of the 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries

Social media mining, debate and feelings: digital public opinion’s reaction in five presidential elections in Latin America

Characterizing Twitter Users Who Engage in Adversarial Interactions against Political Candidates

Follower-Followee Network, Communication Networks, and Vote Agreement of the U.S. Members of Congress

Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media