Abstract:This paper focuses on analyzing the difference between fractional order boost in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) mode using Caputo and Riemann–Liouville's) (R–L's) fractional order calculus definitions respectively. The steady‐state values of inductor current and output voltage as well as voltage gain are mainly analyzed and experimentally verified. Summary Fractional‐order calculus is an extension of the integer‐order calculus in that its order is not limited to integers but can be noninteger as well, thus making the application of fractional‐order calculus more flexible. It has been shown that actual reactive elements such as capacitors and inductors have fractional‐order properties and that the theory of fractional‐order calculus can be utilized to more accurately characterize circuits and systems containing reactive elements. However, there is no uniform definition of fractional order calculus. Different definitions will yield different results in solving the same fractional‐order circuits and systems, and it is worth exploring whether these differences have an impact on the accuracy of solving fractional‐order systems. Taking a fractional‐order boost converter running in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) as an example, this paper focuses on the differences between the Riemann–Liouville (R–L) and the Caputo fractional calculus definitions. Effects of the two definitions on the division of the converter's CCM (continuous conduction mode) and DCM operating regions are analyzed, as well as their impact on the characterization of a fractional‐order boost converter in DCM operation, including the DC (direct current) operating point, current ripple, and voltage gain. Simulations and experiments show that the analytical results based on the R–L definition can more accurately describe the operation of a real fractional‐order converter than those based on the Caputo definition.

Comparative Study of Riemann-Liouville and Caputo Derivative Definitions in Time-Domain Analysis of Fractional-Order Capacitor.

Differences between Riemann–Liouville and Caputo calculus definitions in analyzing fractional boost converter with discontinuous‐conduction‐mode operation

Modeling and Analysis of the Fractional-Order Flyback Converter in Continuous Conduction Mode by Caputo Fractional Calculus

Discussion On Fractional Order Derivatives

A Note on the Definition of Fractional Derivatives Applied in Rheology

Stability Analysis of Fractional-Order Linear System with Time Delay Described by the Caputo–Fabrizio Derivative

Extension of the resistance, inductance, capacitance electrical circuit to fractional derivative without singular kernel

Modeling and Characteristics Analysis for a Buck-Boost Converter in Pseudo-Continuous Conduction Mode Based on Fractional Calculus

Modeling and Analysis of Caputo–Fabrizio Definition-Based Fractional-Order Boost Converter with Inductive Loads

Variable‐order Caputo derivative of LC and RC circuits system with numerical analysis

Numerical solution for the model of RLC circuit via the fractional derivative without singular kernel

On the Leibniz rule and Laplace transform for fractional derivatives.

Equivalence of the Initialized Riemann-Liouville Derivatives and the Initialized Caputo Derivatives

Generalized Modeling of the Fractional-Order Memcapacitor and Its Character Analysis

Discussion on the Leibniz Rule and Laplace Transform of Fractional Derivatives Using Series Representation

Difference between charge-voltage relations of ordinary and fractional capacitors

Application of Fractional Modified Taylor Wavelets in the Dynamical Analysis of Fractional Electrical Circuits under Generalized Caputo Fractional Derivative

Modeling and Analysis of the Fractional Order Buck Converter in DCM Operation by Using Fractional Calculus and the Circuit-Averaging Technique

A generalized definition of Caputo derivatives and its application to fractional ODEs

Generalization of Caputo-Fabrizio Fractional Derivative and Applications to Electrical Circuits

A study on fractional order financial model by using Caputo–Fabrizio derivative