Abstract:The 2016 Central Italy earthquake has demonstrated the seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings which are typical of the small towns of that area. The majority of the houses were seriously damaged and a great number of them totally collapsed causing the loss of many lives as well as economic and cultural losses. The lack of awareness and of proper retrofit intervention led to a disruptive scenario. Among many collapse mechanisms that have been detected, the one due to reinforced concrete roofs has been the most discussed. Firstly because of its dangerousness, secondly because the replacement of old wooden roofs with reinforced concrete roofs is indeed a widespread retrofit intervention since it is highly recommended by national codes. The aim of this intervention is to improve the robustness of the structure achieving the so called “box-like behavior”. A concrete roof is able to distribute the loads more evenly and to connect the walls to each other and finally to avoid the slipping of the beams that was common for masonry buildings with a wooden roof. However, in most cases, the retrofit intervention, done by private owners with the belief of making their house safer, turned out to be destructive. The reason of this failure was the ineffective connection between the top beam ring and the masonry walls that should have been consolidated before the intervention. Thus, the significant increase of stiffness and load at the top of the buildings led to the collapse of walls and to the overturning of concrete roofs, which remained undamaged. Fig.1 shows the effects of the Central Italy earthquake in a building retrofitted with a reinforced concrete roof. It can be seen the clear detachment of the roof that collapsed under the seismic action disrupting the masonry walls and then overturned. It is also clear the poor quality of the masonry that could not bear such a high load. Fig.1 – Masonry building before and after the Central Italy earthquake, Pescara del Tronto. The paper proposes simple analytical models to illustrate the collapse mechanism of masonry buildings retrofitted with reinforced concrete roofs. As the failure of concrete roof depends on the characteristics of other components of the structure, local collapse mechanisms involving walls have been analyzed as well, especially the ones due to out of plane forces. These types of mechanisms, such as wall overturning or vertical flexure, involve the loss of some structural 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE 2017 Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017 components of the building compromising its equilibrium and favoring the overturning of the roof. The models, based on kinematic linear analysis, are used to evaluate the horizontal forces that are able to activate a specific collapse mechanism. The building is composed of macro-elements which move following a mechanism that must respect the boundary conditions. The load multiplier is the unknown horizontal force that is proportional to the vertical loads applied to the macro-elements. The method is able to determine the most probable collapse mechanism which is the one that requires less energy to be activated. The final purpose is to determine a safety coefficient that can be used to establish the safety level of the building. It would be so possible for private owners with reinforced concrete roofs to understand the safety level of their buildings and if further retrofit interventions are necessary.

The Role of Reinforced Concrete Roofs in the Seismic Performance of Masonry Buildings

Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete roofs on masonry buildings

Dynamic Progressive Collapse Response of Multi-Storey Frame Structures with Masonry Infills

Precast Industrial Buildings in Southern Europe: Loss of Support at Frictional Beam-to-column Connections under Seismic Actions

Modeling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Effects of Geometrical Features on the Seismic Response of Historical Masonry Towers

Investigations of masonry churches seismic performance with numerical models: application to a case study

Seismic Response of Masonry Buildings in Historical Centres Struck by the 2016 Central Italy Earthquake. Impact of Building Features on Damage Evaluation

Seismic assessment and dissipative bracing retrofit-based protection of infills and partitions in RC structures

Introspection on Improper Seismic Retrofit of Basilica Santa Maria Di Collemaggio after 2009 Italian Earthquake

The Dynamic Behaviour of the Roof Interventions in the Basilica San Francesco in Assisi

Code-based brittle capacity models for seismic assessment of pre-code RC buildings: comparison and consequences on retrofit

Fragility curves of masonry buildings in aggregate accounting for local mechanisms and site effects

Seismic retrofit cost model for Italian masonry residential buildings to support territorial-scale risk analysis

Modelling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian pre-code and low-code Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Part I: Bare Frames

Seismic performance of an existing RC structure retrofitted with buckling restrained braces

Parametric study on the in-plane performance of a steel frame retrofit solution for URM buildings using DEM

Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers

Seismic out-of-plane retrofit of URM walls using timber strong-backs

Seismic Loss Estimation in Pre-1970 Residential RC Buildings: The Role of Infills and Services in Low–Mid-Rise Case Studies

Considerations Regarding the Retrofit Intervention of Santa Maria Di Collemaggio Basilica in L'Aquila Following 2009 Italian Earthquake