Abstract:1 : The asymmetric matching pennies contradiction posed by Goeree and Holt (2001; “Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions”) posits that contrary to the prediction of mixed strategy Nash equilibrium, experimental subjects’ choices are in practice, based heavily on the magnitudes of their own payoffs. Own-payoff effects are robustly confirmed in several separate studies in the literature (Ochs, 1995; McKelvey, Palfrey and Weber, 2000; Goeree, Holt and Palfrey, 2003). However, recent psychology literature finds that people from collectivist cultures are substantially more adept at taking the perspective of others compared to people from individualist cultures, suggesting that such populations may more readily apply the reasoning needed to obtain mixed strategy equilibrium. Closely following the experimental setups of Goeree and Holt (2001) and related studies, we conduct a series of asymmetric matching pennies games in China, hypothesizing play which is closer to equilibrium frequencies. Contrary to previous experiments which were conducted in the United States, we find that the behavior of our subjects is in fact very close to the mixed strategy equilibrium, and there are essentially no own-payoff effects among Row players who face the large payoff asymmetry. In a Quantal Response Equilibrium framework allowing for altruism or spite, the behavior of our subjects corresponded to a positive spite parameter, whereas the results of previous studies corresponded to altruism. Our results highlight the importance of testing behavior in games across populations and cultures, before generalizing behavioral anomalies to humans as a whole (Henrich, Heine and Norenzayan, 2010; Henrich, Boyd, Bowles, Camerer, Fehr and Gintis, 2004).

Bluffing in Price Bargain Promotes Resource Utilization at the Individual Level but Leads to the Imbalance of Social Welfare

Bluffing Promotes Overconfidence on Social Networks

The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game

Consumption Pricing Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Resources Based on Multi-Agent Game Theory: an Interactive Analytical Model and Experimental Validation

Benefit distribution in urban renewal from the perspectives of efficiency and fairness: A game theoretical model and the government's role in China

Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Maxims nudge equitable or efficient choices in a Trade-Off Game

Fairness and Deception in Human Interactions with Artificial Agents

Negotiating Socially Optimal Allocations of Resources

A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games

A Free and Fair Economy: A Game of Justice and Inclusion

Probabilistic fair behaviors spark its boost in the Ultimatum game: the strength of good Samaritans

Returning a Treasure: Revisiting the Asymmetric Matching Pennies Contradiction

The restart effect in social dilemmas shows humans are self-interested not altruistic

Heterogeneous Preferences, Decision-Making Capacity, And Phase Transitions In A Complex Adaptive System (Vol 106, Pg 8423, 2009)

Truthfulness, Proportional Fairness, and Efficiency

Using deep reinforcement learning to promote sustainable human behaviour on a common pool resource problem

Fair and Welfare-Efficient Constrained Multi-matchings under Uncertainty

Resolving social dilemmas with minimal reward transfer

Boosting Sharing Economy: Social Welfare or Revenue Driven?

Be Selfish, But Wisely: Investigating the Impact of Agent Personality in Mixed-Motive Human-Agent Interactions