Subchronic MK-801 Treatment During Adolescence Induces Long-Term, Not Permanent, Excitatory-Inhibitory Imbalance in the Rat Hippocampus.

Yu-Nu Ma,Ya-Xin Sun,Ting Wang,Han Wang,Yue Zhang,Yun-Ai Su,Ji-Tao Li,Tian-Mei Si
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172807
IF: 5.195
2019-01-01
European Journal of Pharmacology
Abstract:Adolescence is a critical neurodevelopmental period for both excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) neurotransmission and often witnesses the typical onsets of schizophrenia. One possibility is that disruptions in adolescent neurodevelopmental processes may produce schizophrenia-like behavioral and neurobiological abnormalities. We previously reported that subchronic treatment of adolescent animals with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 induced cognitive deficits and reduced interneuron densities in rat medial prefrontal cortex, and these changes persisted one week after MK-801 exposure. However, it remains unclear how this treatment may affect E/I balance in hippocampus, which has long been associated with the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Here, we examined hippocampal E/I biomarkers in adolescent rats treated with MK-801 (0.2 mg/ kg, i.p., 14 days) and found increases in the ratio of the expression levels of vesicular glutamate transporter-1 (VGluT1) and vesicular gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter (VGAT) 24 h and 7 days after MK-801 exposure. Interestingly, the increased VGluT1/VGAT ratio at the two time points was driven by upregulated VGluT1 expression and downregulated VGAT expression, respectively. The decrease in VGAT expression persisted 14 days after MK-801 exposure and recovered two weeks later. No alterations in hippocampal interneuron densities were observed. Behaviorally, the treatment decreased prepulse inhibition at 24 h but not 14 days, after MK-801 exposure. Taken together, these results demonstrate that subchronic NMDA receptor blockade during adolescence induces long-term, but not permanent, E/I imbalance in the rat hippocampus, which could be attributed to the dysregulation of glutamatergic transmission in the short term and of GABAergic transmission in the long term.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?