Abstract:Abstract Objective: To approach the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) obtained on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: 53 locally advanced breast cancer patients participated in this prospective study on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were treated with weekly neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin for 4 cycles. DWI and ADC value were examined before chemotherapy(the first time point), after the first and the forth cycle of chemotherapy(the second and the third time point). Patients were categorized as high responders if their ADC at the second time point were higher by 2 times the standard deviation than the mean pre-chemotherapy ADC, and otherwise the patients were considered as low responders. Logistic regression was conducted to examine the independent factors predictive of clinical complete response(CR) and pathologic complete response(pCR).Results: CR was documented in 13 patients (24.5%); partial response in 36 patients (67.9%); stable disease in 4 patients (7.5%) and no patient had progressive disease. 11 patients(20.8%) have achieved pCR. There was a strong positive correlation between the percentage changes in ADC value at the third time points and the degree of the tumor reduction. A significant increase in ADC value was observed at the second time point compared with the first time point (1.104±0.117×10-3mm2/s, 1.220±0.158×10-3mm2/s, P<0.001), while the decrease of the longest diameter of the tumors measured by physical examination, ultrasound or MRI or the tumor volumn measured by MRI were not (P>0.05). Logistic regression revealed that percentage changes of ADC value at the second time point were significantly associated with CR(P=0.022, hazard ratio[HR] =1.08, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.01∼1.16) and pCR(P=0.022, HR =1.11, 95%CI: 1.02∼1.21). The AUC value of the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.721(95%CI: 0.512∼0.931, P=0.017) and 0.775(95%CI: 0.598∼0.952, P=0.005) in the two diagnostic tests for CR and pCR, and the sensitivity and specificity were 76.9%, 63.6% and 77.5%, 90.5%, respectively. According to categorizing system described above, 10 patients(18.9%) were considered as high responders and 43 patients(81.1%) low responders. 7 patients(70%) of the high responders have achieved clinical CR and pCR while for the low responders there were only 6 patients(14.0%) and 4 patients (9.3%) proven to have CR and pCR. The difference have both reached statistical significance(P=0.001, P<0.001). Logistic regression confirmed that the categorizing system was independently predictive of CR(P=0.006, HR=42.26, 95%CI: 2.86∼624.08) and pCR(P=0.013, HR=25.19, 95%CI: 2.00∼318.91). Taking this categorizing system as a dignostic test, the sensitivity and specificity were 53.8% and 92.5% for CR and 63.6% and 92.9% for pCR, respectively.Conclusions: The change of ADC value obtained on DWI after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy occured prior to the morphologic changes of the tumor and at this time ADC value could to some extent predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4025.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Molecular Subtype and Lymph Node Metastases in Invasive Breast Cancer: a Multicenter Analysis

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Correlation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging with Prognostic Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancers.

Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Predict Tumor Grade and Expression of Ki-67 in Breast Cancer? A Multicenter Analysis

Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker for Assessing the Level of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes: Value in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for prediction of immunohistochemical receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Pathology in Lymphoma

Predictive Ability of DWI/ADC and DCE-MRI Kinetic Parameters in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions and in Building a Prediction Model.

Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Features of Breast Tumours and the Surrounding Stroma Reflect Intrinsic Heterogeneous Characteristics of Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer

The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?

Is simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging valuable for predicting molecular subtypes of breast cancer?

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma

On the Additional Information Provided by 3T-MRI ADC in Predicting Tumor Cellularity and Microscopic Behavior

Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging parameters in tumor and peritumoral stroma for prediction of molecular subtypes in breast cancer

Discrimination of Axillary Metastatic from Nonmetastatic Lymph Nodes with Propeller Diffusion-Weighted Mr Imaging in A Metastatic Breast Cancer Model and Its Correlation with Cellularity

The Relationship between Breast Cancer Subtypes, Prognostic Factors, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis

Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Assessment of Molecular Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer

Application of advanced diffusion models from diffusion weighted imaging in a large cohort study of breast lesions

Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer.

Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?