Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection of Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors: A Prospectivecomparative Studyof Conventional Devices Versus Hybrid Knife

Xiaowei Tang,Zhengjie Wei,Silin Huang,Jieqiong Zhou,Yutang Ren,Bo Jiang,Wei Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201510001-01548

2015-01-01

Abstract:Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) is being increasingly used for upper gastrointestinal (GI) submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. However, settings for ESTD procedure have not been standardized, and no studies have directly compared ESTD devices in humans. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hook knife with hybrid knife during ESTD procedure. Methods: Between September 2011 and December 2014, ESTD was performed for 61 upper GI submucosal lesions. Of these, 24 lesions were treated by conventional devices (injection needle and hook knife, CD group), whereas 37 lesions were treated by hybrid knife (HK group) (Figure 1, 2). Data regarding to procedure time, en bloc resection rates, adverse events and others were prospectively collected and compared between two groups.Figure 1Figure 2Results: There were no significant differences in the age, sex and other baseline characteristics between two groups (Table 1). The mean procedural time was significantly shorter in HK group than CD group (42.7 ± 22.5 min vs. 57.5 ± 25.7 min, P0.05). During the follow-up time, no recurrence occurred in two groups (Table 2).Table 1: Patient baseline characteristicsTable 2: Clinical outcomes and histopathological resultsConclusion: Our study demonstrated that conventional devices and hybrid knife do not differ in terms of efficacy or complication rates, but the hybrid knife can reduce frequency of devices exchange and procedure time.