Modeling the Combined Efficacy of Rilotumumab (R; Amg 102) Plus Epirubicin/Cisplatin/Capecitabine (ecx) for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction (g/egj) Cancer.

Sameer Doshi,Steven Kathman,Rui Tang,Per Olsson Gisleskog,Elwyn Loh,Sarita Dubey,Yizhou Jiang,Kelly S. Oliner,Ross C. Donehower,Timothy Iveson,Min Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.2594
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:2594 Background: R is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) that inhibits signaling though the MET receptor. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of 121 patients with G/EGJ cancer, R (7.5 or 15 mg/kg) + ECX showed trends for improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to ECX alone. The combined effects of R and ECX on tumor reduction and PFS were modeled using the phase 2 data. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was used to estimate R PK parameters and individual R concentrations (C) over time. A tumor dynamic model was developed to characterize the combined effects of R with ECX on tumor growth and cell death and to evaluate the impact of baseline patient characteristics and lab values on model parameters. A discrete time-survival model was developed with PFS and C data to evaluate the effect of R, ECX, and the interaction between R and ECX on PFS within a given time interval. Results: R exhibited linear PKs with an estimated mean clearance of 0.216 L/d/70 kg. The tumor dynamic model suggested that R and ECX worked jointly to reduce tumor size from baseline via inhibition of the tumor growth rate constant (Kgrowth) and stimulation of the death rate of tumor cells (Kdeath). Assuming the maximal inhibition of Kgrowth is 100%, the estimated mean C that provided 50% maximal Kgrowth inhibition (EC50) was 6.71 µg/mL. The mean (SD) estimated effect of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg R on Kgrowth was 90.1% (3.8%) and 95.5% (1.9%) inhibition, respectively. None of the tested baseline factors appeared to significantly affect tumor reduction by R + ECX. In the discrete time-survival model, the R and ECX combination significantly improved PFS, and the model suggests that the magnitude of the effect of one treatment was dependent on the other. Conclusions: R and ECX appeared to work in combination to decrease tumor size and to improve PFS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?