Abstract:This paper develops new insights into quantitative methods for the validation of computational model prediction. Four types of methods are investigated, namely classical and Bayesian hypothesis testing, a reliability-based method, and an area metric-based method. Traditional Bayesian hypothesis testing is extended based on interval hypotheses on distribution parameters and equality hypotheses on probability distributions, in order to validate models with deterministic/stochastic output for given inputs. Formulations and implementation details are outlined for both equality and interval hypotheses. Two types of validation experiments are considered—fully characterized (all the model/experimental inputs are measured and reported as point values) and partially characterized (some of the model/experimental inputs are not measured or are reported as intervals). Bayesian hypothesis testing can minimize the risk in model selection by properly choosing the model acceptance threshold, and its results can be used in model averaging to avoid Type I /II errors. It is shown that Bayesian interval hypothesis testing, the reliability-based method, and the area metric-based method can account for the existence of directional bias, where the mean predictions of a numerical model may be consistently below or above the corresponding experimental observations. It is also found that under some specific conditions, the Bayes factor metric in Bayesian equality hypothesis testing and the reliability-based metric can both be mathematically related to the p-value metric in classical hypothesis testing. Numerical studies are conducted to apply the above validation methods to gas damping prediction for radio frequency (RF) micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) switches. The model of interest is a general polynomial chaos (gPC) surrogate model constructed based on expensive runs of a physics-based simulation model, and validation data are collected from fully characterized experiments.

A Pattern-Based Validation Method for the Credibility Evaluation of Simulation Models.

A Quantitative Credibility Evaluation Method of Dynamic Equivalent Model Based on Power Sensitivity

A New Validation Metric for Models with Correlated Responses Using Limited Experimental and Simulation Data

Model Validation Via Uncertainty Propagation and Data Transformations

A Credibility Assessment Approach for Scenario-Based Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Functions

A Contribution to Validating of Simulation Models in Production and Logistics

Methodology of Simulation Credibility Evluation for Complex Product Based on DS Evidence Theory

An empirical learning-based validation procedure for simulation workflow

A credibility integration evaluation approach of complex simulation systems based on type-2 fuzzy set and perceptual computing

Multi-level and Metrics Evaluation Approach for Data-Driven Based Sensor Models

The Validation of A Microscopic Simulation Model: A Methodological Case Study

A New Methodology For Simulation Validation And Model Modification

New Fuzzy Simulation-Based Algorithms for the Credibility of Fuzzy Events

Knowledge-based model validation using a custom metric

A Validation and Quality Assessment Method with Metamorphic Relations for Unsupervised Machine Learning Software.

On credibility validation of the artificial urban rail transportation system

A Family of Simulation Criteria to Guide DEVS Models Validation Rigorously, Systematically and Semi-Automatically

A Cumulant-based Method for Credibility Assessment of Power System State Estimation

Simulation Credibility Assessment Methodology with FPGA-based Hardware-in-the-loop Platform

Reliability Calculation Method of Ship-to-air Missile Simulation Model

Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights