Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

UNIQUE HUE JUDGMENTS UNDER LIGHT SOURCES WITH DIFFERENT CHROMATICITIES

Unique Hue Judgments Using Saturated and Desaturated Munsell Samples under Different Light Sources

Investigating Unique Hues at Different Chroma Levels with a Smaller Hue Angle Step

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition at Different Chromaticities

An Investigation of Colour Appearance for Unrelated Colours under Photopic and Mesopic Vision

Change of Color Appearance Due to Extremely High Light Level: Corresponding Colors under 100 and 3000 Cd/m2

Individual Differences in the Assessment of Colour Saturation.

Specification For The Chromaticity Of White And Coloured Light Sources

Quantifying Colour Appearance for Unrelated Colour under Photopic and Mesopic Vision.

Interactive effect of illuminance and correlated colour temperature on colour preference and degree of white light sensation for Chinese observers

Development of a Uniform Colour Space for Evaluating Colour Differences Under HDR Viewing Conditions

Consideration of Light Level in Specifying Light Source Color Rendition

Preference among Light Sources with Different Duv but Similar Colour Rendition: A Pilot Study

EFFECT OF LIGHT LEVEL ON COLOR PREFERNECE AND SPECIFICAITON OF LIGHT SOURCE COLOR RENDITION

Judgment of White Appearance for Surface Colors under Individual and Simultaneous Observations

Light Sources with a Larger Gamut Area Can Enhance Color Preference under a Lower Light Level

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition Vary with Average Fidelity, Average Gamut, and Gamut Shape

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Assessing Colour Differences under a Wide Range of Luminance Levels Using Surface and Display Colours

Accumulation of Corresponding Colours Under Extreme Chromatic Illuminations and modification of CAM16

Quantifying Colour Appearance. Part III. Supplementary LUTCHI Colour Appearance Data