A General Study on the Thoughts of Dignity in Confucianism and Daoism
Qiao Qingju
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2013.04.012
2013-01-01
Journal of Social Sciences
Abstract:In pre-Qin Chinese philosophy, dignity isn't just confined to the external prestige; it is also the outcome of virtue. Confucianism, somewhat resembles Kantianism, holds that man possesses dignity by his virtue, which can be called a virtue theory of dignity, while Daoism hold one does so only when he embodies Dao in him, which can be called Dao theory of dignity. Differentiating from Kantian theory, Lao Zi's way for one to get dignity is passive and negative, the disadvantage of which is it failed to draw such a bottom line that at where one's desires shouldn't be reduced any more, otherwise it would result in the destruction of his dignity. Zhuang Zi maintains that from the view point of the Dao everything possesses inherent dignity equaling to every other thing's dignity. This dignity theory is surely a breakthrough to Kantian dignity theory, which will lead us to the establishment of an ecological attitude towards nature. The neo-confucianism put forward a dignity theory of super moral autonomy, by which, man, through making efforts of spiritual cultivations and of an expansions of his knowledge of heavenly principles, can attain a state in which his mind-heart is identified with those heavenly principles anywhere and in every moment. Zhu Xi says "a sage is a man of great virtue; thereby he is full of dignity naturally."