VASCULAR DEMENTIA IN CHRONIC CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED AND CONTROLLED STUDY

B. Han,G. Zhao,Y. Wang,Y. Song,W. Li,G. Yang,M. Deng,X. Sui,L. Gan,Z. Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.039
IF: 9.6
2019-01-01
Chest
Abstract:PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes between chronic critically ill patients with vascular dementia (VD) and without VD, both accepted long-term invasive mechanical ventilation(IMV) via tracheotomy. METHODS: It was a prospective ,randomized and controlled study. A total of 86 elderly(72.5±3.4 yrs) chronic critically ill patients supported with IMV via tracheotomy for type Ⅱrespiratory failure were included. All subjects were divided into two groups: VD group(n=43, sever cognitive impairment) and Non-VD group(n=43,without cognitive impairment) . Settings in both groups: pressure regulated volume control(PRVC) mode, PS:15-25cmH2O, PEEP:4-8cmH2O,VT: 6-8ml/kg,FiO2:35-45%. RESULTS: Compared with Non-VD group, VD group had a lower occurrence of anxiety and stress ulcer (p<0.001). Blood catecholamine concentration, incidence of malignant arrhythmia and myocardial infarction in VD group were significantly lower than in Non-VD group (p<0.05),better patient-ventilator synchronization in VD group than in Non-VD group. There was no difference in occurrence of VAP and stroke in both groups(p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic critically ill patients without VD accepted IMV who were in a state of clear consciousness seem to be vulnerable to acute cardiovascular event and stress ulcer, but not in VD patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Chronic critically ill patients with long-term MIV maybe contribute to reducing the risk of adverse events by appropriate intervention with the level of their cognition. Further studies need to confirm our findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?