Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

A DPk-medoids Clustering Algorithm with Differential Privacy Protection

Privacy Preserving Distributed DBSCAN Clustering

DPHMM: Customizable Data Release with Differential Privacy Via Hidden Markov Model.

A Density Peaking Clustering Algorithm for Differential Privacy Preservation.

An Improved Density Peak Clustering Algorithm Based on Chebyshev Inequality and Differential Privacy

GAPBAS: Genetic Algorithm-based Privacy Budget Allocation Strategy in Differential Privacy K-Means Clustering Algorithm

A Differential Privacy-Based Protecting Data Preprocessing Method for Big Data Mining

A New Density Peak Clustering Algorithm With Adaptive Clustering Center Based on Differential Privacy

k-Means SubClustering: A Differentially Private Algorithm with Improved Clustering Quality

Differentially Private k-Means Clustering with Guaranteed Convergence

Distributed K-Means Clustering Guaranteeing Local Differential Privacy

A Differentially Private Clustering Algorithm for Well-Clustered Graphs

A clustering-based differential privacy protection algorithm for weighted social networks

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Clustering Algorithm For Privacy Preservation On Mapreduce

A DP Canopy K-Means Algorithm for Privacy Preservation of Hadoop Platform.

DPM: Clustering Sensitive Data through Separation

Differential Privacy Algorithm Based on Personalized Anonymity

Achieving data utility-privacy tradeoff in Internet of Medical Things: A machine learning approach

Differentially private k-center problems

Research on Local Fingerprint Image Differential Privacy Protection Method Based on Clustering Algorithm and Regression Algorithm Segmentation Image