Abstract:Background: Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing. Objectives: To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people. Methods: MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project. Results: Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within Goals, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In Relationships, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational Processes and procedures, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within Technology and infrastructure, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care. Limitations: Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic. Conclusions: Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways. Future work: Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals. Study registration: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Social care data and its fitness for integrated health and social care service governance: an exploratory qualitative analysis in the Dutch context

Governing Integrated Health and Social Care: An Analysis of Experiences in Three European Countries

Towards data-informed shared decision making: what do we need?

Struggling with the governance of interprofessional elderly care in mandated collaboratives: a qualitative study

[Linking mental healthcare- and Statistics Netherlands microdata to assess the effectiveness of care]

"We Need to Know These Things": Use Cases for Combined Social and Clinical Data Among Primary Care-Based Clinical and Social Care Providers

Governance intricacies in implementing regional shared care records: A qualitative study in the national health service, England

Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study

Routine data collection in home care: A national survey of home care providers in England

How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries

Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy

Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis

The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust

Interpreting and evaluating open norms of person-centred care in daily regulatory practice of the Dutch nursing home care setting

Integrated Care for Frail Elderly: A Qualitative Study of a Promising Approach in The Netherlands

Exploring the barriers, facilitators and needs to use patient outcomes in district nursing care: A multi-method qualitative study

Collaborative governance at the start of an integrated community approach: a case study

Integrated care for the elderly in Utrecht Overvecht, the Netherlands

Creating public value in the care at home sector: a mixed-method study about expectations of primary stakeholders using a social exchange perspective

29 Sharing qualitative health and social care research data: key stakeholder views

Legal rights of client councils and their role in policy of long-term care organisations in the Netherlands