Assessment of Cartilage T 1 rho Values in Osteoarthritic Patients with and without Meniscal Tears at 3 T
L. Wang,M. E. Schweitzer,R. R. Regatte
2008-01-01
Abstract:Introduction Prestructural characteristics of early osteoarthritis (OA) are the loss of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and collagen breakdown (1). T1rho mapping has been shown to be sensitive to changes in cartilage proteoglycan loss (2). Previous studies have demonstrated that the T1rho values are elevated in OA patients when compared with corresponding healthy subjects (3, 4). Recently, it has been reported (5, 6) that the T1rho varied between meniscus and the corresponding adjacent cartilages of healthy subjects and OA patients. The main purpose of current work was to determine cartilage T1rho changes in OA patients with and without mensical tears. Methods Two groups of OA subjects were recruited (n = 5 without meniscal tears, 4 females, 1 male, mean age = 60 years ± 8.4, age range = 50 62 years, and n = 5 with meniscal tears, 2 females, 3 males, mean age = 65 years ± 6.8, age range = 60 – 65 years). Approval for this study was obtained from local institutional review board (IRB) and informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. All the MRI experiments were performed on a 3.0T clinical scanner utilizing an 8-channel phased array knee coil (transmitreceive). 3D T1rho-weighted images with parallel imaging (AF = 2) were acquired with TR/TE = 175/2.04 ms, spin-lock frequency = 300Hz, number of slices = 25, time of spin-lock (TSL) = 2/10/20/30 ms, slice thickness = 3 mm, matrix = 256X128, FOV = 15 cm, flip angle = 25, bandwidth = 260 Hz using the GRE sequence based on the spin-lock techniques (7). Mean cartilage T1rho values were evaluated on six different regions of interest in these two groups. The Student’s t-test was used to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences in T1rho relaxation times between the two groups, separately in the lateral and medial compartments. Results and Discussion Representative T1rho maps of cartilage obtained from an OA patient without meniscal tears are shown in Fig. 1 (a, b). Similarly, Fig. 1 (c, d) shows representative T1rho maps of cartilage from an OA patient with meniscal tears. As is shown in Fig. 2, the average T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage in the lateral compartment in OA patients without meniscal tears were 56.64 ± 4.74 ms, 43.71 ± 7.94 ms, and 54.03 ± 6.49 ms, respectively. The average T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patella cartilage in the medial compartment in OA patients without meniscal tears were 62.61 ± 5.34 ms, 51.49 ± 5.25 ms, and 54.77 ± 7.27 ms, respectively. On the other hand, the average T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patella cartilage in the lateral compartment in OA patients with meniscal tears were 67.10 ± 6.51 ms, 64.71 ± 7.82 ms, and 67.45 ± 7.42 ms, respectively. The average T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patella cartilage in the medial compartment in OA patients with meniscal tears were 67.13 ± 2.05 ms, 58.94 ± 8.63 ms, and 65.68 ± 9.59 ms, respectively. There are significant difference in cartilage T1rho relaxation times between the two groups within the lateral compartment (P < 0.05 for T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patella cartilages, respectively). However, there are no significant differences in cartilage T1rho relaxation times between the two groups within the medial compartment (P > 0.05 for T1rho values of femoral, tibial, and patella cartilage, respectively). Conclusion The preliminary results suggest that there are significant differences in T1rho relaxation times in patients with meniscal tears, only in the lateral compartment (P<0.05) but not in the medial compartment (P>0.05). Therefore degeneration following meniscal tears appears to be compartment specific. References 1) Mlynarik V et al, J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 10: 497-502. 2) Akella SV et al, Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46: 419-423. 3) Li X et al, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.011. 4) Blumenkrantz G et al, Eur Cell Mater. 2007; 13: 76-86. 5) Bolbos RI et al, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.016. 6) Rauscher I et al, Radiology. 2008; 249: 591-600. 7) Pakin SK et al, Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56: 563-571.