Abstract:Purpose: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries cause changes in tibiofemoral joint kinematics and can lead to early onset of osteoarthritis (OA) despite surgical reconstruction. Changes in kinematics may alter the contact area (CA) between the femoral and tibial cartilage surfaces. Evaluations of the tibiofemoral CA in ACL injured individuals can help understand the mechanism behind cartilage degeneration seen after ACL injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in tibiofemoral CA and their positions at the time of injury and after reconstruction. Methods: Subjects: Bilateral knee MRI scans of thirty healthy adults (15 males, age = 28.93 ± 7.81 years, BMI = 23.44 ± 2.74 kg/m2) with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were obtained within 6 months of their injury (i.e. baseline) prior to surgery and again at 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Fourteen healthy control subjects (10 males, age = 31.78 ± 4.80 years, BMI = 24.01 ± 2.26 kg/m2) with no history of knee injuries were recruited for comparison. Exclusion criteria included prior diagnosis of cartilage degeneration, inflammatory arthritis, or surgery in either knee. MRI Protocol: Subjects' knees were scanned with a 3 Tesla MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an 8-channel phased array knee coil (Invivo, Orlando, FL, USA). Sagittal T2 fast spin-echo (FSE) images with TR/TE = 4000/49.3 ms, slice thickness of 1.5 mm, field of view of 16 cm, 512 x 512 matrix size and echo train length 9 were obtained at extension, loaded axially with of 25% total body weight. Image Processing: Regions of interest were delineated in FSE images with an in-house Matlab program using a spline-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm. The midpoint between the tibial medial and lateral posterior cortical border was defined as the origin of the tibial coordinate system. Tibiofemoral cartilage CA was defined as the weight bearing regions on the tibial surface (Figure 1). Fluids indicated by hyperintensity and menisci were excluded along with areas close to the tibial spine. CA centroid position (CP) was defined as the geometric center of CA projected onto the axial plane. The flexion angle (FA) was defined by the angle between the lines through the midshaft of femur and tibia in the anteroposterior (AP) direction. A single observer processed all MR images and all measurements were taken in the extended position. Statistical Analysis: Reliability was measured using Intraclass Correlation coefficient (ICC) over three trials of 10 control subjects. Differences in mean CA and CP between groups and longitudinal changes from baseline to 1 year were measured with a Student's t-test. Significance was defined as P<0.05 for all analyses. Results: Reliability: The intra-operator ICC's were 0.922 and 0.942 for medial and lateral CA respectively, and 0.996 and 0.996 for medial and lateral CP. Contact Area: Medial CA was larger in injured knees compared to control knees at both time points and the difference reached significance at one year (P=0.036). For the medial CA, there were significant differences between contralateral and control knees at baseline and one year (P=0.043 and P=0.008). There was no significant difference between injured and contralateral knees at the two time points (Table 1). Centroid Position: CP along the AP direction was significantly more posterior for the injured knees compared to the contralateral knees at baseline for both medial and lateral regions (P=0.001 and p=0.043). No significant difference was found between injured and control knees or between contralateral and control knees (Table 2). Conclusions: ACL injured subjects had increased in the medial CA for both injured and contralateral knees compared to the controls. The difference between contralateral and control knees suggests that there may be inherent differences in knee kinematics of ACL injured patients. Lack of significant difference in CA between the two time points indicates that reconstruction did not restore CA and knee kinematics. Overall, the result of the study shows altered knee kinematics in those with ACL injuries. Increased CA may indicate changes in knee kinematics that could lead to ACL tears and OA. Acknowledgement: This study is supported by the grant NIH/NIAMS P50 AR060752.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Analysis of the Articular Cartilage T1ρ and T2 Relaxation Times Changes after ACL Reconstruction in Injured and Contralateral Knees and Relationships with Bone Shape.

3D bone-shape changes and their correlations with cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times and patient-reported outcomes over 3-years after ACL reconstruction.

Longitudinal Analysis of Knee Articular Cartilage Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of T1rho and T2 Mapping

Reliability and changes in knee cartilage T2 relaxation time from 6 to 24 months after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Using 3D MRI Bone Shape to Predict Pre-Osteoarthritis of the Knee 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Patellofemoral contact forces and knee gait mechanics 3 months after ACL reconstruction are associated with cartilage degradation 24 months after surgery

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Cartilage Status: A Comparison Between Young Men with and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Cartilage T1ρ and T2 Are Associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes after Acute ACL Injuries

Tibiofemoral joint structural change from 2.5 to 4.5 years following ACL reconstruction with and without combined meniscal pathology

Knee joint unloading and daily physical activity associate with cartilage T2 relaxation times 1 month after ACL injury

Evaluation of Tibiofemoral Cartilage, Contact Area Alterations in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patients

Postoperative Time Dependent Tibiofemoral Articular Cartilage Contact Kinematics During Step-Up after ACL Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury and age affect knee cartilage T2 but not thickness

Evolving cartilage strain with pain progression and gait: a longitudinal study post-ACL reconstruction at six and twelve months

Association Between Tibiofemoral Bone Shape Features and Retears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Temporal changes in tibiofemoral relationship following anterior cruciate ligament injury: Implications for rotational dynamics and clinical outcomes

In the Acute Phase of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Quantitative Assessment of Matrix Changes and Correlation between Different States of Meniscus and Adjacent Cartilage

Quantitative T2-Mapping and T2⁎-Mapping Evaluation of Changes in Cartilage Matrix after Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and the Correlation between the Results of Both Methods

Multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI analysis of cartilage degeneration 10 Years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MOON-MRI protocol and preliminary results

Quantitative MRI Analysis of Patellofemoral Joint Cartilage Health 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis

Relationship Between Markers of Type II Collagen Metabolism and Tibiofemoral Joint Space Width Changes After ACL Injury and Reconstruction