A Comparative Assessment of Outcomes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion in Pierre Robin Sequence

Jeffrey B. Ai,Ryan G. McQueen,Riley M. McCarty,Mukul Sharda,Maie Zagloul,Sameer Shakir,Cleo Yi,Kristen Klement,Kant Y. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010287
2024-08-07
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to resolve upper airway obstruction in patients with Robin sequence (RS). A retrospective cohort study was performed of subjects presenting to a tertiary care pediatric center who underwent either primary MDO or TLA for the treatment of RS between 2004 and 2020. N=59 subjects met inclusion criteria (n=34 MDO, n=25 TLA), and there were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics other than age at surgery (MDO 31 d vs. TLA 17 d, P =0.049). Preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was similar between cohorts (33.9 and 46.7, P =0.38). Subjects who underwent MDO demonstrated improved AHI on initial postoperative polysomnogram performed at 2 weeks (3.4 vs. 11.6, P =0.014), however AHI at the second postoperative timepoint (270 vs. 142 d, P= 0.007) was no different between cohorts (2.8 vs. 2.6, P =0.89). No subject in either group required enteral nutrition or supplemental oxygen at last follow-up. In subjects undergoing MDO, 14.7% demonstrated temporary asymmetric marginal mandibular nerve dysfunction. Forty-seven percent of MDO patients had injury to first primary molars. MDO and TLA both ultimately achieved similar long-term resolution of upper airway obstruction and associated feeding difficulties in patients with Robin sequence. MDO offered a more immediate airway improvement, but the procedure carried a potential risk of neurosensory and dental injury when compared with TLA.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?