A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical approaches for improving airway stability in infants with Robin Sequence: evaluating complications and outcomes

Sneha Pendem,Naveen Kumar Jayakumar,Sreejee Gopalakrishnan,Gururaj Arakeri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.04.003
IF: 2.018
2024-04-13
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the most effective and least morbid surgical technique for relieving retroglossal airway obstruction in infants with Robin Sequence (RS). The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included 25 studies (24 cohorts and 1 case series) that investigated interventions for airway improvement, including conservative measures, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), mandibular distraction (MDO), and tracheostomy. The primary outcome variable was complication rates, while predictor variable was the interventions for airway improvement. Results showed that conservative measures were the preferred initial management strategy in most studies, while TLA was recommended for infants with mild obstruction, and MDO or tracheostomy was reserved for severe cases. Only complications could be analyzed via meta-analysis due to data heterogeneity, revealing that tracheostomy had a Summary Odds ratio of 5.39 in favor of TLA, while MDO had a ratio of 2.8 over TLA, and the complication rates were similar between MDO and tracheostomy. If conservative measures fail, the study recommends mandibular distraction as the preferable technique for stable airway enhancement. If the infant is unsuitable for distraction, tongue-lip adhesion may serve as an alternative, while tracheostomy should be reserved for cases of severe multi-level obstruction. The authors propose that large-scale, multicenter trials comparing long-term outcomes are required to establish definitive guidelines.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?