Abstract:Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment for achalasia. However, postoperative pain management for these patients is often neglected by anesthesiologists because of the short operative time, short hospital stay and the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. Aim: To assess the pain and sleep quality of achalasia patients receiving the POEM procedure and investigate factors that affect postoperative pain. Methods: This observational study included patients with achalasia who underwent POEM at Zhongshan Hospital from December 2017 to March 2018. General anesthesia was performed with endotracheal intubation. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), postoperative sleep quality, basic patient information, and surgical parameters were collected. Depending on whether the 12-h post-POEM VAS score was less than 4, patients were divided into two groups, a well-controlled pain group and a poorly controlled pain group. Univariate, multivariate, and stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to investigate risk factors for poor pain control. A prediction model of post-POEM pain risk was established in the form of a nomogram. The calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the clinical usage of the prediction model. Repeated measures analysis of variance and simple effect analysis were used to verify whether differences in the VAS and sleep scores of the high- and low-risk groups, divided by the model from the raw data, were statistically significant. Results: A total of 45 eligible patients were included. Multivariate logistic regression and further stepwise logistic regression analysis found that the preoperative Eckardt score [odds ratio (OR): 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-2.84, P < 0.001], previous treatment (OR: 7.59, 95%CI: 1.12-51.23, P = 0.037) and the distance between the end of the muscle incision and the cardia (OR: 1.52, 95%CI: 0.79-293.93, P = 0.072) were risk factors for post-POEM pain. Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated that VAS (P = 0.0097) and sleep scores (P = 0.043) were higher in the high-risk group, and the interactions between the two main effects were obvious (VAS score: P = 0.019, sleep score: P = 0.035). Further simple effect analysis found that VAS scores were higher in the high-risk group at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h (P = 0.005, P = 0.019, P < 0.001), and sleep scores were higher in the high-risk group at day 1 (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Achalasia patients who underwent POEM experienced serious postoperative pain, which may affect sleep quality. A higher Eckardt score, previous treatment, and a longer distance between the muscle incision ending and the cardia were risk factors for poor post-POEM pain control.

A Risk-Scoring System to Predict Clinical Failure for Patients with Achalasia after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Bypassing Large Submucosal Vessels During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Reduces Operative Time and Intraoperative Blood Loss in Patients with Achalasia

A Prediction Model and Nomogram for Technical Difficulty of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Landscape of Adverse Events Related to Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in 3135 Patients and a Risk-Scoring System to Predict Major Adverse Events.

The Effect of Prior Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Achalasia Undergoing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Factors associated with peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in geriatric patients: a propensity score matching study

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on achalasia with ineffective prior treatment

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Long-term efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia under different criteria

Short-term Safety and Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia in Children

Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years

The relationship between cardiac muscularis propria and clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia

Salvage Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy is a Promising Treatment for Achalasia after Myotomy Failure.

Effectiveness of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in the Treatment of Achalasia: A Pilot Trial in Chinese Han Population with a Minimum of One‐year Follow‐up

Risk‐scoring system predicting need for hospital‐specific interventional care after peroral endoscopic myotomy

Salvage peroral endoscopic myotomy is a promising treatment for achalasia following a myotomy failure

High Eckardt score and previous treatment were associated with poor postperoral endoscopic myotomy pain control: A retrospective study

Clinical value of repeated peroral endoscopic myotomy for persistent/ recurrent achalasia

Impedance planimetry values for predicting clinical response following peroral endoscopic myotomy