Abstract:Objective: Occupants with extreme body size and shape, such as the small female or the obese, were reported to sustain high risk of injury in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Dimensional scaling approaches are widely used in injury biomechanics research based on the assumption of geometrical similarity. However, its application scope has not been quantified ever since. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the valid range of scaling approaches in predicting the impact response of the occupants with focus on the vulnerable populations.Methods: The present analysis was based on a data set consisting of 60 previously reported frontal crash tests in the same sled buck representing a typical mid-size passenger car. The tests included two categories of human surrogates: 9 postmortem human surrogates (PMHS) of different anthropometries (stature range: 147-189cm; weight range: 27-151kg) and 5 anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). The impact response was considered including the restraint loads and the kinematics of multiple body segments. For each category of the human surrogates, a mid-size occupant was selected as a baseline and the impact response was scaled specifically to another subject based on either the body mass (body shape) or stature (the overall body size). To identify the valid range of the scaling approach, the scaled response was compared to the experimental results using assessment scores on the peak value, peak timing (the time when the peak value occurred), and the overall curve shape ranging from 0 (extremely poor) to 1 (perfect match). Scores of 0.7 to 0.8 and 0.8 to 1.0 indicate fair and acceptable prediction.Results: For both ATDs and PMHS, the scaling factor derived from body mass proved an overall good predictor of the peak timing for the shoulder belt (0.868, 0.829) and the lap belt (0.858, 0.774) and for the peak value of the lap belt force (0.796, 0.869). Scaled kinematics based on body stature provided fair or acceptable prediction on the overall head/shoulder kinematics (0.741, 0.822 for the head; 0.817, 0.728 for the shoulder) regardless of the anthropometry. The scaling approach exhibited poor prediction capability on the curve shape for the restraint force (0.494 and 0.546 for the shoulder belt; 0.585 and 0.530 for the lap belt). It also cannot well predict the excursion of the pelvis and the knee.Conclusions: The results revealed that for the peak lap belt force and the forward motion of the head and shoulder, the underlying linear relationship with body size and shape is valid over a wide anthropometric range. The chaotic nature of the dynamic response cannot be fully recovered by the assumption of the whole-body geometrical similarity, especially for the curve shape. The valid range of the scaling approach established in this study can be reasonably referenced in predicting the impact response of a given specific population with expected deviation. Application of this knowledge also includes proposing strategies for restraint configuration and providing reference for ATD and/or human body model (HBM) development for vulnerable occupants.

Frontal Crash Simulations Using Parametric Human Models Representing a Diverse Population

Developing Parametric Human Models Representing Various Vulnerable Populations in Motor Vehicle Crashes

Effects of Obesity on Occupant Responses in Frontal Crashes: A Simulation Analysis Using Human Body Models

An automated method to morph finite element whole-body human models with a wide range of stature and body shape for both men and women

Impact Response Comparison Between Parametric Human Models And Postmortem Human Subjects With A Wide Range Of Obesity Levels

Assessment of finite element human body and ATD models in estimating injury risk in far-side impacts using field-based injury risk

A Simulation Study on the Efficacy of Advanced Belt Restraints to Mitigate the Effects of Obesity for Rear-Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes

Adaptive restraint design for a diverse population through machine learning

Hello, world! VIVA+: A human body model lineup to evaluate sex-differences in crash protection

A computational study of injury severity and pattern sustained by overweight drivers in frontal motor vehicle crashes

Study on the difference of frontal impact response among people of different sizes

The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model

A Human Body Model Based Method for Injury Risk Prediction Considering Occupant Stature and Posture

BMI and Risk of Serious Upper Body Injury Following Motor Vehicle Crashes: Concordance of Real-World and Computer-Simulated Observations

Estimation of the Impact of Human Body Variation on Its Crash Behavior Using Machine Learning Methods

Scaling Approach in Predicting the Seatbelt Loading and Kinematics of Vulnerable Occupants: How Far Can We Go?

Development and validation of an elderly human body model for frontal impacts

Finite element comparison of human and Hybrid III responses in a frontal impact

The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles

Impact responses and injury analyses of a three-year-old occupant seating in forward and rearward facing CRSs using different computational models

Numerical investigation of driver injury risks in car-to-end terminal crashes using a human finite element model