Nephrology referral slows the progression of chronic kidney disease, especially among patients with anaemia, diabetes mellitus, or hypoalbuminemia: A single‐centre, retrospective cohort study

Atsuki Ide,Keisuke Ota,Miho Murashima,Kodai Suzuki,Takahisa Kasugai,Yuki Miyaguchi,Tatsuya Tomonari,Minamo Ono,Masashi Mizuno,Maki Hiratsuka,Takeshi Kawai,Takashi Suzuki,Kazutaka Murakami,Takayuki Hamano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.14311
2024-05-03
Nephrology
Abstract:Summary at a glance The slope of eGFR decline was slower after nephrology referral. The improvement in eGFR slope was more prominent among those with hypoalbuminemia, diabetes and anaemia. The improvement in eGFR slope after nephrology referral did not seem to be through improvement in anaemia, or addition of anti‐hypertensives or antidiabetics. Background The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommend nephrology referral for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 to 5, significant proteinuria and persistent microscopic haematuria. However, the recommendations are opinion‐based and which patients with CKD benefit more from nephrology referral has not been elucidated. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients referred to our nephrology outpatient clinic from April 2017 to March 2019 were included. We excluded patients considered to have an acute decline in kidney function (annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >10 mL/min/1.73 m2). The slopes of eGFR before and after nephrology referral were estimated and compared by linear mixed effects models. Interaction between time and referral status (before or after referral) was assessed and effect modifications by the presence of diabetes, proteinuria (defined by urine dipstick protein 2+ or more), urine occult blood, hypoalbuminemia (defined by albumin levels less than 3.5 g/dL) and anaemia (defined by haemoglobin levels less than 11.0 g/dL) were evaluated. Results The eGFR slope significantly improved from −2.05 (−2.39 to −1.72) to −0.96 (−1.36 to −0.56) mL/min/1.73 m2/year after nephrology referral (p
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?