Antecedents and Intervention Strategies of Self-Concept Clarity:A New Perspective from Three Facets of Self-Concept Structural Integration
Du Xiaopeng,Jiang Jiang,Jiang Wen,Wang Juan,Peng Wenya,Yang Kairong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230122
2023-01-01
Abstract:Self-concept clarity refers to the extent to which an individual’s self-concept is clearly and confidently defined, internally consistent, and temporally stable. Self-concept clarity influences the quality of our lives from many aspects（e.g., aggression, the use of products as identity bolsters,the management of social conflict, depression, suicide behavior, and so on）. Compared to its broad and significant influences, we know little about how to achieve self-concept clarity efficiently because little work has been done to examine antecedents of self-concept clarity from an integrated theoretical framework. Inspired by the notion that self-concept clarity in nature is a metacognitive feeling related to the structural coherence of self-concept, the present article provides a new theoretical framework of self-concept clarity from the perspective of self-concept structural integration. The theoretical framework is helpful to solve the theoretical and practical dilemmas of self-concept clarity.The present review firstly deconstructed the structural integration of self-concept into three facets: the abstract integration of concrete experiences, the synchronic integration across situations, and the diachronic integration across temporal periods. Then, the present review analyzed and recommended integrating principles for each facet: generalizing and integrating principles for the abstract integration, compatibility for the synchronic integration, and continuity for the diachronic integration. Based on these analyses, we proposed some strategies to improve self-concept clarity using the integrating principles. The present review also proposed several strategies to improve self-concept clarity based on these integrating principles of the three structural integrating facets. We reviewed related and pertinent research providing initial evidence for these integrating principles. Moreover,by sketching the three facets of self-concept structural integration, the review sorted out the environmental factors and personal factors that may hinder the integrating principles and illustrated why these factors would influence self-concept clarity. From the environmental aspect, adverse experiences in disadvantaged situations（e.g., low socioeconomic status, family disharmony adverse, and adverse childhood experiences）, situational conflicts（e.g.,value conflicts, role conflicts, and cultural conflicts）, and situational changes（e.g., role exists, break-ups） may be related to a lower level of self-concept clarity. From the personal aspect, the valence of self-concept elements（e.g., low self-esteem）, contingencies of self-concept elements（e.g., intrinsic contingent self-esteem）, and the objectively organized structure of self-concept elements（e.g., integrational self-concept） are all related to self-concept clarity.By deconstructing self-concept structural integration into three facets and sketching the integrating principles for each facet, the present review proposed a new theoretical framework for understanding and improving self-concept clarity. Research on how self-concept clarity could be influenced and on how to conduct interventions on self-concept clarity is still an emerging field. This new structural integrating perspective provides a network of novel hypotheses. Although this review provides initial evidence for the proposed causal paths, many theoretical assumptions are yet to be appropriately and sufficiently tested. That is, this review may stimulate a fruitful branch of research in theoretical and applied fields related to the selfconcept clarity.