Abstract:To limit tail biting incidence, most pig producers in Europe tail dock their piglets. This is despite EU Council Directive 2008/120/EC banning routine tail docking and allowing it only as a last resort. The paper aims to understand what it takes to fulfil the intentions of the Directive by examining economic results of four management and housing scenarios, and by discussing their consequences for animal welfare in the light of legal and ethical considerations. The four scenarios compared are: 'Standard Docked', a conventional housing scenario with tail docking meeting the recommendations for Danish production (0.7 m2/pig); 'Standard Undocked', which is the same as 'Standard Docked' but with no tail docking, 'Efficient Undocked' and 'Enhanced Undocked', which have increased solid floor area (0.9 and 1.0 m2/pig, respectively) provision of loose manipulable materials (100 and 200 g/straw per pig per day) and no tail docking. A decision tree model based on data from Danish and Finnish pig production suggests that Standard Docked provides the highest economic gross margin with the least tail biting. Given our assumptions, Enhanced Undocked is the least economic, although Efficient Undocked is better economically and both result in a lower incidence of tail biting than Standard Undocked but higher than Standard Docked. For a pig, being bitten is worse for welfare (repeated pain, risk of infections) than being docked, but to compare welfare consequences at a farm level means considering the number of affected pigs. Because of the high levels of biting in Standard Undocked, it has on average inferior welfare to Standard Docked, whereas the comparison of Standard Docked and Enhanced (or Efficient) Undocked is more difficult. In Enhanced (or Efficient) Undocked, more pigs than in Standard Docked suffer from being tail bitten, whereas all the pigs avoid the acute pain of docking endured by the pigs in Standard Docked. We illustrate and discuss this ethical balance using numbers derived from the above-mentioned data. We discuss our results in the light of the EU Directive and its adoption and enforcement by Member States. Widespread use of tail docking seems to be accepted, mainly because the alternative steps that producers are required to take before resorting to it are not specified in detail. By tail docking, producers are acting in their own best interests. We suggest that for the practice of tail docking to be terminated in a way that benefits animal welfare, changes in the way pigs are housed and managed may first be required.

Effects of Tail Docking And/or Teeth Clipping on Behavior, Lesions, and Physiological Indicators of Sows and Their Piglets

Effects of Tail Docking and Teeth Clipping on the Physiological Responses, Wounds, Behavior, Growth, and Backfat Depth of Pigs

Teeth Clipping, Tail Docking and Toy Enrichment Affect Physiological Indicators, Behaviour and Lesions of Weaned Pigs after Re-Location and Mixing

The impact of prenatal stress on basal nociception and evoked responses to tail-docking and inflammatory challenge in juvenile pigs

Tranquillizing Effect of Passiflora incarnata Extract: Outcome on Behavioral and Physiological Indicators in Weaning Pigs with Intact Tails

Effects of Weaning Stress on Intestinal Morphology, Mucosal Barrier and P38 MAPK Signaling Pathway in Piglets

The Influence of the Feature of Environmental Enrichment and Tail Docking on Biting Behavior and Productivity in Weaned Piglets

Effects of Low-Dose Organic Trace Minerals on Performance, Mineral Status, and Fecal Mineral Excretion of Sows.

Effects of Weaning Modes on the Intestinal pH, Activity of Digestive Enzymes, and Intestinal Morphology of Piglets

Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes

Effects of Two Different Early Socialization Models on Social Behavior and Physiology of Suckling Piglets

Behavior and Physiology of Two Different Sow Breeds in a Farrowing Environment During Late 35-Day Lactation.

Postural Changes, Nursing Behavior, and Production Performance of Two Breeds of Sows in Enriched Environment

Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining

Effects of Different Combinations of Sodium Butyrate, Medium-Chain Fatty Acids and Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on the Reproductive Performance of Sows and Biochemical Parameters, Oxidative Status and Intestinal Health of Their Offspring

Effects of early intermittent maternal separation on behavior, physiological, and growth performance in piglets

Investigating risk factors behind piglet facial and sow teat lesions through a literature review and a survey on teeth reduction

Effects of the Maternal Behavioral Characteristics of Lying Down on Piglet Crushing in Minpig and Yorkshire Sows

Study on maternal defensive behavior of different breed sows during lactation

Physiology, Immunity, Stereotyped Behavior, And Production Performance Of The Lactating Sows In The Enriched Environment

Comparative Effects of Dietary Supplementations with Sodium Butyrate, Medium-chain Fatty Acids, and N-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Late Pregnancy and Lactation on the Reproductive Performance of Sows and Growth Performance of Suckling Piglets.