Crystallographic and Theoretical Investigations of Er 2 @C 2 n (2 n=82, 84, 86): Indication of Distance-Dependent Metal-Metal Bonding Nature.

Shuaifeng Hu,Wangqiang Shen,Le Yang,Guangxiong Duan,Peng Jin,Yunpeng Xie,Takeshi Akasaka,Xing Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201902321
2019-01-01
Chemistry - A European Journal
Abstract:Successful isolation and characterization of a series of Er-based dimetallofullerenes present valuable insights into the realm of metal-metal bonding. These species are crystallographically identified as Er-2@C-s(6)-C-82, Er-2@C-3v(8)-C-82, Er-2@C-1(12)-C-84, and Er-2@C-2v(9)-C-86, in which the structure of the C-1(12)-C-84 cage is unambiguously characterized for the first time by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, natural bond orbital analysis demonstrates that the two Er atoms in Er-2@C-s(6)-C-82, Er-2@C-3v(8)-C-82, and Er-2@C-2v(9)-C-86 form a two-electron-two-center Er-Er bond. However, for Er-2@C-1(12)-C-84, with the longest Er...Er distance, a one-electron-two-center Er-Er bond may exist. Thus, the difference in the Er...Er separation indicates distinct metal bonding natures, suggesting a distance-dependent bonding behavior for the internal dimetallic cluster. Additionally, electrochemical studies suggest that Er-2@C82-86 are good electron donors instead of electron acceptors. Hence, this finding initiates a connection between metal-metal bonding chemistry and fullerene chemistry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?