Abstract:The past decade has seen a substantial rise in the amount of mis- and disinformation online, from targeted disinformation campaigns to influence politics, to the unintentional spreading of misinformation about public health. This development has spurred research in the area of automatic fact checking, from approaches to detect check-worthy claims and determining the stance of tweets towards claims, to methods to determine the veracity of claims given evidence documents. These automatic methods are often content-based, using natural language processing methods, which in turn utilise deep neural networks to learn higher-order features from text in order to make predictions. As deep neural networks are black-box models, their inner workings cannot be easily explained. At the same time, it is desirable to explain how they arrive at certain decisions, especially if they are to be used for decision making. While this has been known for some time, the issues this raises have been exacerbated by models increasing in size, and by EU legislation requiring models to be used for decision making to provide explanations, and, very recently, by legislation requiring online platforms operating in the EU to provide transparent reporting on their services. Despite this, current solutions for explainability are still lacking in the area of fact checking. This thesis presents my research on automatic fact checking, including claim check-worthiness detection, stance detection and veracity prediction. Its contributions go beyond fact checking, with the thesis proposing more general machine learning solutions for natural language processing in the area of learning with limited labelled data. Finally, the thesis presents some first solutions for explainable fact checking.

FAKTA: an Automatic End-to-End Fact Checking System

Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkers

FactCheck Editor: Multilingual Text Editor with End-to-End fact-checking

aedFaCT: Scientific Fact-Checking Made Easier via Semi-Automatic Discovery of Relevant Expert Opinions

AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators

Fully Automated Fact Checking Using External Sources

Automated Justification Production for Claim Veracity in Fact Checking: A Survey on Architectures and Approaches

FacTeR-Check: Semi-automated fact-checking through Semantic Similarity and Natural Language Inference

OpenFactCheck: A Unified Framework for Factuality Evaluation of LLMs

Knowledge Enhanced Fact Checking and Verification

FLEEK: Factual Error Detection and Correction with Evidence Retrieved from External Knowledge

Automatic Fact-Checking Using Context and Discourse Information

An AI-based System to Assist Human Fact-Checkers for Labeling Cantonese Fake News on Social Media

Explainability of Automated Fact Verification Systems: A Comprehensive Review

Fact Checking Beyond Training Set

"The Data Says Otherwise"-Towards Automated Fact-checking and Communication of Data Claims

Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions

How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation

A KG-based Enhancement Framework for Fact Checking Using Category Information

Towards Explainable Fact Checking

Fact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoning