Abstract:The past decade has seen a substantial rise in the amount of mis- and disinformation online, from targeted disinformation campaigns to influence politics, to the unintentional spreading of misinformation about public health. This development has spurred research in the area of automatic fact checking, from approaches to detect check-worthy claims and determining the stance of tweets towards claims, to methods to determine the veracity of claims given evidence documents. These automatic methods are often content-based, using natural language processing methods, which in turn utilise deep neural networks to learn higher-order features from text in order to make predictions. As deep neural networks are black-box models, their inner workings cannot be easily explained. At the same time, it is desirable to explain how they arrive at certain decisions, especially if they are to be used for decision making. While this has been known for some time, the issues this raises have been exacerbated by models increasing in size, and by EU legislation requiring models to be used for decision making to provide explanations, and, very recently, by legislation requiring online platforms operating in the EU to provide transparent reporting on their services. Despite this, current solutions for explainability are still lacking in the area of fact checking. This thesis presents my research on automatic fact checking, including claim check-worthiness detection, stance detection and veracity prediction. Its contributions go beyond fact checking, with the thesis proposing more general machine learning solutions for natural language processing in the area of learning with limited labelled data. Finally, the thesis presents some first solutions for explainable fact checking.

Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions

The State of Human-centered NLP Technology for Fact-checking

Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers

Towards Explainable Fact Checking

Autonomation, not Automation: Activities and Needs of Fact-checkers as a Basis for Designing Human-Centered AI Systems

Automated Justification Production for Claim Veracity in Fact Checking: A Survey on Architectures and Approaches

The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who

Fully Automated Fact Checking Using External Sources

Automatic Fact-Checking Using Context and Discourse Information

Claim Detection for Automated Fact-checking: A Survey on Monolingual, Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Research

Some Observations on Fact-Checking Work with Implications for Computational Support

FAKTA: an Automatic End-to-End Fact Checking System

How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation

A Richly Annotated Corpus for Different Tasks in Automated Fact-Checking

Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey

Explainability of Automated Fact Verification Systems: A Comprehensive Review

That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims

AI and Automation's Role in Iberian Fact-checking Agencies

Fact Checking Beyond Training Set

Human and technological infrastructures of fact-checking

Automated Claim Matching with Large Language Models: Empowering Fact-Checkers in the Fight Against Misinformation