Abstract:The structure and diversity of microbial communities are intrinsically hierarchical due to the shared evolutionary history of their constituents. This history is typically captured through taxonomic assignment and phylogenetic reconstruction, sources of information that are frequently used to group microbes into higher levels of organization in experimental and natural communities. Connecting community diversity to the joint ecological dynamics of the abundances of these groups is a central problem of community ecology. However, how microbial diversity depends on the scale of observation at which groups are defined has never been systematically examined. Here, we used a macroecological approach to quantitatively characterize the structure and diversity of microbial communities among disparate environments across taxonomic and phylogenetic scales. We found that measures of biodiversity at a given scale can be consistently predicted using a minimal model of ecology, the Stochastic Logistic Model of growth (SLM). This result suggests that the SLM is a more appropriate null-model for microbial biodiversity than alternatives such as the Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity. Extending these within-scale results, we examined the relationship between measures of biodiversity calculated at different scales (e.g. genus vs. family), an empirical pattern previously evaluated in the context of the Diversity Begets Diversity (DBD) hypothesis (Madi et al., 2020). We found that the relationship between richness estimates at different scales can be quantitatively predicted assuming independence among community members, demonstrating that the DBD can be sufficiently explained using the SLM as a null model of ecology. Contrastingly, only by including correlations between the abundances of community members (e.g. as the consequence of interactions) can we predict the relationship between estimates of diversity at different scales. The results of this study characterize novel microbial patterns across scales of organization and establish a sharp demarcation between recently proposed macroecological patterns that are not and are affected by ecological interactions.

Dominance network analysis provides a new framework for studying the diversity–stability relationship

A new dominance concept and its application to diversity-stability analysis

Understanding diversity–synchrony–stability relationships in multitrophic communities

Dominance to egalitarian transition in diverse communities

Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability

Deciphering Centimeter-Scale Microbial Biogeographic Patterns and Community Assembly Processes From A 3D Perspective

Investigating macroecological patterns in coarse-grained microbial communities using the stochastic logistic model of growth

The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability

The mechanistic link between health and gut microbiota diversity

Drivers of diversity within and between microbial communities during stochastic assembly

Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?

Stability and Synchrony Across Ecological Hierarchies in Heterogeneous Metacommunities: Linking Theory to Data

A macroecological perspective on genetic diversity in the human gut microbiome

Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota

Diversity Begets Stability in an Evolving Network

Ecosystem stability relies on diversity difference between trophic levels

Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil.

Diversity, stability, and reproducibility in stochastically assembled microbial ecosystems

A unified framework for partitioning the drivers of stability of ecological communities

Soil Microbial Community Diversity and Driving Mechanisms

Master regulators of evolution and the microbiome in higher dimensions