Abstract:Importance: In several pay-for-performance programs, Medicare ties payments to readmission rates but accounts only for a limited set of patient characteristics-and no measures of social risk-when assessing performance of health care providers (clinicians, practices, hospitals, or other organizations). Debate continues over whether accounting for social risk would mitigate inappropriate penalties or would establish lower standards of care for disadvantaged patients if they are served by lower-quality providers. Objectives: To assess changes in hospital performance on readmission rates after adjusting for additional clinical and social patient characteristics by using methods that distinguish the association between patient characteristics and readmission from between-hospital differences in quality. Design, setting, and participants: Using Medicare claims for admissions in 2013 through 2014 and linked US Census data, we assessed several clinical and social characteristics of patients that are not currently used for risk adjustment in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. We compared hospital readmission rates with and without adjustment for these additional characteristics, using only the average within-hospital associations between patient characteristics and readmission as the basis for adjustment, thereby appropriately excluding hospitals' distinct contributions to readmission from the adjustment. Main outcomes and measures: All-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. Results: The study sample consisted of 1 169 014 index admissions among 1 003 664 unique Medicare beneficiaries (41.5% men; mean [SD] age, 79.9 [8.3] years) in 2215 hospitals. Compared with adjustment for patient characteristics currently implemented by Medicare, adjustment for the additional characteristics reduced overall variation in hospital readmission rates by 9.6%, changed rates upward or downward by 0.37 to 0.72 percentage points for the 10% of hospitals most affected by the additional adjustments (±30.3% to ±58.9% of the hospital-level standard deviation), and would be expected to reduce penalties (in relative terms) by 52%, 46%, and 41% for hospitals with the largest 1%, 5%, and 10% of penalty reductions, respectively. The additional adjustments reduced the mean difference in readmission rates between hospitals in the top and bottom quintiles of high-risk patients by 0.53 percentage points (95% CI, 0.50-0.55; P < .001), or 54% of the difference estimated with CMS adjustments alone. Both clinical and social characteristics contributed to these reductions, and these reductions were considerably greater for conditions targeted by the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Adjustment for social characteristics resulted in greater changes in rates of readmission or death than in rates of readmission alone. Conclusions and relevance: Hospitals serving higher-risk patients may be penalized substantially because of the patients they serve rather than their quality of care. Adjusting solely for within-hospital associations may allow adjustment for additional patient characteristics to mitigate unintended consequences of pay for performance without holding hospitals to different standards because of the patients they serve.

Impact of Repeated Reimbursement Penalties on Hospital Total Quality Scores

Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections

The Long-Term Effect of Financial Penalties on 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rates

Care Quality for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Readmission Penalty Era

Effect of Medicare's nonpayment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: lessons for future policy

An Exploratory Analysis of the Association between Hospital Quality Measures and Financial Performance

Hospital Penalization in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program

What is the impact of a clinically related readmission measure on the assessment of hospital performance?

Do Quality Measures or Hospital Characteristics Predict Readmission Penalties for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

Readmissions performance and penalty experience of safety-net hospitals under Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

Association of the New Peer Group–Stratified Method With the Reclassification of Penalty Status in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

Performance in Federal Value-Based Programs of Hospitals Recognized by the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology for High-Quality Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction Care

Hospital Medicare Spending per Beneficiary: A Longitudinal Study

Evaluating the robustness of the CMS Hospital Value-Based Purchasing measurement system

Evaluating Quality of Care for Patients with Asthma in the Readmission Penalty Era

Trends in HCAHPS Survey Scores, 2008-2019: A Quality Improvement Perspective

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Financial Impact of 30-Day Readmissions for Selected Medical Conditions: A Focus on Hospital Quality Performance

Assessment of the Effect of Adjustment for Patient Characteristics on Hospital Readmission Rates: Implications for Pay for Performance

Hospitals serving nursing home residents disproportionately penalized under hospital readmissions reduction program

Exploring the Relationship Between Hospital Patient Safety Culture and Performance on Measures of Hospital-Acquired Conditions

Financial Incentives to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections Under Alternative Payment Arrangements