Abstract:Importance: Excess 30-day readmissions have declined substantially in hospitals initially penalized for high readmission rates under the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). Although a possible explanation is that the policy incentivized penalized hospitals to improve care processes, another is regression to the mean (RTM), a statistical phenomenon that predicts entities farther from the mean in one period are likely to fall closer to the mean in subsequent (or preceding) periods owing to random chance. Objective: To quantify the contribution of RTM to declining readmission rates at hospitals initially penalized under the HRRP. Design, setting, and participants: This study analyzed data from Medicare Provider and Analysis Review files to assess changes in readmissions going forward and backward in time at hospitals with high and low readmission rates during the measurement window for the first year of the HRRP (fiscal year [FY] 2013) and for a measurement window that predated the FY 2013 measurement window for the HRRP among hospitals participating in the HRRP. Hospital characteristics are based on the 2012 survey by the American Hospital Association. The analysis included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with an index hospitalization for 1 of the 3 target conditions of heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and who were discharged alive from February 1, 2006, through June 30, 2014, with follow-up completed by July 30, 2014. Data were analyzed from January 23, 2018, through March 29, 2019. Exposures: Hospital Readmission Reduction Program penalties. Main outcome and measures: The excess readmission ratio (ERR), calculated as the ratio of a hospital's readmissions to the readmissions that would be expected based on an average hospital with similar patients. Hospitals with ERRs of greater than 1.0 were penalized. Results: A total of 3258 hospitals were included in the study. For the 3 target conditions, hospitals with ERRs of greater than 1.0 during the FY 2013 measurement window exhibited decreases in ERRs in the subsequent 3 years, whereas hospitals with ERRs of no greater than 1.0 exhibited increases. For example, for patients with heart failure, mean ERRs declined from 1.086 to 1.038 (-0.048; 95% CI, -0.053 to -0.043; P < .001) at hospitals with ERRs of greater than 1.0 and increased from 0.917 to 0.957 (0.040; 95% CI, 0.036-0.044; P < .001) at hospitals with ERRs of no greater than 1.0. The same results, with ERR changes of similar magnitude, were found when the analyses were repeated using an alternate measurement window that predated the HRRP and followed up hospitals for 3 years (for patients with heart failure, mean ERRs declined from 1.089 to 1.044 [-0.045; 95% CI, -0.050 to -0.040; P < .001] at hospitals with below-mean performance and increased from 0.915 to 0.948 [0.033; 95% CI, 0.029 to 0.037; P < .001] at hospitals with above-mean performance). By comparing actual changes in ERRs with expected changes due to RTM, 74.3% to 86.5% of the improvement in ERRs for penalized hospitals was explained by RTM. Conclusions and relevance: Most of the decline in readmission rates in hospitals with high rates during the measurement window for the first year of the HRRP appeared to be due to RTM. These findings seem to call into question the notion of an HRRP policy effect on readmissions.

Hospital Penalization in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program

Association of the New Peer Group–Stratified Method With the Reclassification of Penalty Status in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections

The Long-Term Effect of Financial Penalties on 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rates

Readmissions performance and penalty experience of safety-net hospitals under Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

Assessment of the Effect of Adjustment for Patient Characteristics on Hospital Readmission Rates: Implications for Pay for Performance

Care Quality for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Readmission Penalty Era

Hospitals serving nursing home residents disproportionately penalized under hospital readmissions reduction program

Impact of Repeated Reimbursement Penalties on Hospital Total Quality Scores

Accounting for the Growth of Observation Stays in the Assessment of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

What is the impact of a clinically related readmission measure on the assessment of hospital performance?

Social Risk Adjustment In The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Systematic Review And Implications For Policy

Effect of Medicare's nonpayment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: lessons for future policy

Regression to the Mean in the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

Exploring the Relationship Between Hospital Patient Safety Culture and Performance on Measures of Hospital-Acquired Conditions

Including socioeconomic status reduces readmission penalties to safety-net hospitals.

Hospital Readmission after Post-acute Care at Different Settings: Estimation using the Propensity Score Matching Method

Evaluating inpatient adverse outcomes under California's Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program

The Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) reduction program: using cranberry treatment to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and avoid Medicare payment reduction penalties

Medicare's hospital readmissions reduction program and the rise in observation stays

Clinical Interventions to Reduce Preventable Hospital Readmission After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention