Abstract:Matching is one of the most widely used study designs for adjusting for measured confounders in observational studies. However, unmeasured confounding may exist and cannot be removed by matching. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis is typically needed to assess a causal conclusion's sensitivity to unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analysis frameworks for binary exposures have been well-established for various matching designs and are commonly used in various studies. However, unlike the binary exposure case, there still lacks valid and general sensitivity analysis methods for continuous exposures, except in some special cases such as pair matching. To fill this gap in the binary outcome case, we develop a sensitivity analysis framework for general matching designs with continuous exposures and binary outcomes. First, we use probabilistic lattice theory to show our sensitivity analysis approach is finite-population-exact under Fisher's sharp null. Second, we prove a novel design sensitivity formula as a powerful tool for asymptotically evaluating the performance of our sensitivity analysis approach. Third, to allow effect heterogeneity with binary outcomes, we introduce a framework for conducting asymptotically exact inference and sensitivity analysis on generalized attributable effects with binary outcomes via mixed-integer programming. Fourth, for the continuous outcomes case, we show that conducting an asymptotically exact sensitivity analysis in matched observational studies when both the exposures and outcomes are continuous is generally NP-hard, except in some special cases such as pair matching. As a real data application, we apply our new methods to study the effect of early-life lead exposure on juvenile delinquency. We also develop a publicly available R package for implementation of the methods in this work.

Comprehensive Comparisons of Major Sequential Design Procedures for Sensitivity Testing

A practical comparative investigation of Bruceton and 3POD2.0 statistical testing methods on friction and impact sensitivity testing

A note on extending Scheffé's modified multiple-comparison procedure to other analysis situations

Applicability Analysis of Sensitivity Test Method

A Multiple Comparisons Procedure for Detecting Differences Between Treatments and A Control in Two-Factor Experiments

Competitive Comparison of Optimal Designs of Experiments for Sampling-based Sensitivity Analysis

Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test

Sample Size Estimation in the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design and the Two-way Enriched Design

Gonogo: An R Implementation of Test Methods to Perform, Analyze and Simulate Sensitivity Experiments

Estimation and Its Applicability of D-Optimality-Based Sensitivity Test under Different Prior Information

Confidence intervals for overall response rate difference in the sequential parallel comparison design

Portable Sensitivity Test Assistant for Initiator Sensitivity Test

Methods of Sequential Test Optimization in Dynamic Environment

Optimal group testing designs for estimating prevalence with uncertain testing errors

Optimal testing resource allocation, and sensitivity analysis in software development

Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies with Continuous Exposures and Binary Outcomes

Modern Sequential Analysis and its Applications to Computerized Adaptive Testing

An exact adaptive test with superior design sensitivity in an observational study of treatments for ovarian cancer

A Calculation Instrument for the Sensitivity Test of Initiating Explosive Device

Step-down trend tests for identifying the minimum effective dose

The uniform general signed rank test and its design sensitivity