Subducted carbonates not required: deep mantle melting explains stable Ca isotopes in kimberlite magmas
Michael A. Antonelli,Andrea Giuliani,Zaicong Wang,Meiling Wang,Lian Zhou,Lanping Feng,Ming Li,Zhaofeng Zhang,Fang Liu,Russell N. Drysdale
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2023.03.025
IF: 5
2023-03-26
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Abstract:Ca isotope geochemistry has great potential for improving our understanding of magmatic systems and for tracing the deep Earth carbon cycle. There are still many open questions, however, regarding the proper application of this relatively novel proxy to the study of mantle-derived magmas, including (i) the possible effects of pressure on mineral-melt Ca isotope fractionation factors, and (ii) the potential of Ca isotopes for tracing incorporation of recycled marine carbonates in mantle-derived magmas. Kimberlites are mantle-derived melts highly enriched in CO 2 and are the deepest-sourced magmas (> 200 km depth) known to erupt at Earth's surface, providing an excellent opportunity to explore these questions. We present Ca isotope data combined with detailed petrographic observations, bulk-carbonate C-O isotope data, and bulk-rock major element analyses, for a suite of 23 well-characterized kimberlite samples from their type-locality (Kimberley, South Africa). These kimberlites have abundant previous evidence for recycled surface materials in their mantle source, including low S isotope and moderately radiogenic Sr isotope compositions, yet display only limited variations in their Ca isotope compositions (δ 44 Ca BSE of -0.08‰ to -0.27‰), with an average of -0.17 ± 0.02‰ (2SE, n = 21). This composition is indistinguishable from average carbonatites [-0.19 ± 0.03‰ (2SE, n = 106)] and OIB from recent studies [-0.16 ± 0.01‰ (2SE, n = 41)], and slightly lower than average MORB [-0.11 ± 0.02‰ (2SE, n = 31)]. Although our samples display a wide range of emplacement styles, alteration conditions, extents of magmatic differentiation, and degrees of mantle-cargo entrainment (i.e., xenocryst accumulation), we find no correlations between Ca isotopes and any of these factors. Instead, we find that low-degree partial melting of the likely kimberlite source lithology (i.e., carbon-bearing garnet lherzolite) yields modelled melt δ 44 Ca BSE values ranging between -0.12‰ and -0.16‰ (at 1400-1500°C), in agreement with the measured Ca isotope compositions of the Kimberley kimberlites. This observation, and the lack of heavy carbon isotope signatures in the examined samples, indicates that kimberlites do not require subducted carbonates in their mantle sources, despite their very high CO 2 contents. Although several recent studies have suggested that equilibrium mineral-melt Ca isotope fractionation factors (e.g., 1000lnα grt-melt ) could be significantly different at higher pressures (i.e., due to pressure-induced changes in Ca-O bond lengths and coordinations), our models successfully reproduce the kimberlite data using pressure-independent predictions for mineral-melt fractionation. It remains possible, however, that differences in isotopic fractionation due to the peculiar composition of kimberlite melts (e.g., high CO 2 , low SiO 2 ) are effectively cancelled out by competing pressure effects, and future work independently targeting these factors will be especially important for our understanding of Ca isotope fractionation in mantle-derived melts and the Ca isotope systematics of Earth's mantle.
geochemistry & geophysics