A Molecular Phylogeny Of The Genus Psittacula Sensu Lato (Ayes: Psittaciformes: Psittacidae: Psittacula, Psittinus, Tanygnathus, Dagger Mascarinus) With Taxonomic Implications

Michael P. Braun,Thomas Datzmann,Thomas Arndt,Matthias Reinschmidt,Heinz Schnitker,Norbert Bahr,Hedwig Sauer-Gürth,Michael Wink
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4563.3.8
IF: 0.9
2019-01-01
Zootaxa
Abstract:The long-tailed parakeets of the genus Psittacula Cuvier, 1800 have thus far been regarded as a homogeneous and monophyletic group of parrots. We used nucleotide sequences of two genetic markers (mitochondrial CYTB, nuclear RAG-1) to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of Psittacula and closely related species. We found that the Asian genus Psittacula is apparently paraphyletic because two genera of short-tailed parrots, Psittinus Blyth, 1842 and Tanygnathus Wagler, 1832, cluster within Psittacula, as does dagger Mascarinus Lesson, 1830. To create monophyletic genera, we propose recognition of the following genera: Himalayapsitta Braun, 2016 for P himalayana, P finschii, P. roseata, and P. cyanocephala; Nicopsitta Braun, 2016 for P. columboides and P. calthrapae; Belocercus S. Muller, 1847 for P. longicauda; Psittacula Cuvier, 1800 for P. alexandri and P. derbiana; Palaeornis Vigors, 1825 for dagger P. wardi and P. eupatria; and Alexandrinus Braun, 2016 for P. krameri, dagger P exsul, and P. (eques) echo. Additionally, Psittacula krameri and P alexandri are paraphyletic species, which should be split to form monophyletic species.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?