A molecular analysis of the mysterious Vaurie’s Nightjar Caprimulgus centralasicus yields fresh insight into its taxonomic status

Manuel Schweizer,Claudia Etzbauer,Hadoram Shirihai,Till Töpfer,Guy M. Kirwan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01767-8
2020-03-25
Journal of Ornithology
Abstract:One of the last remaining enigmas among Palearctic bird species is Vaurie's Nightjar <i>Caprimulgus centralasicus</i>. It is known from a single specimen, said to be an adult female, collected in September 1929 southeast of Yarkand, Xinjiang, in westernmost China, and originally identified as an Egyptian Nightjar <i>C. aegyptius</i>. All major world checklists and authors of monographs on the Caprimulgiformes accept <i>C. centralasicus</i> as a species, but efforts to rediscover it in the field have failed, meaning that occasional doubts have been expressed as to its taxonomic validity. We subjected the holotype of <i>C. centralasicus</i> to a molecular examination and renewed morphological comparisons, with the aim of resolving its status. We independently confirmed in two different laboratories that <i>C. centralasicus</i> has an identical partial fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 b (COI) as five European Nightjars <i>C. europaeus</i>. The overall plumage coloration (but not size) of <i>C. centralasicus</i> is reasonably similar, especially on the upperparts, to at least some specimens of <i>C. europaeus</i> of the subspecies <i>C. e. unwini</i> and <i>C. e. plumipes</i>, and by implication to that of <i>C. e. dementievi</i> too, while several specimens of Sykes's Nightjar <i>C. mahrattensis</i> are a reasonably close match in coloration to <i>C. centralasicus</i>, also lack an obvious nuchal collar, and possess a similar-length tail and pattern. There is a high degree of likelihood that <i>C. centralasicus</i> is a synonym of <i>C. e. plumipes</i>, but the small size of the holotype compared to <i>C. europaeus</i> persists in being difficult to fully rationalize, although we believe that the bird is, in fact, a fledgling in its first plumage, parts of which are still growing, which would explain much of the difference. In addition, based on current data, there is no correspondence between described subspecies of <i>C. europaeus</i> and genetic variability. Phylogeographic structure within <i>C. europaeus</i> and its correspondence with morphological, especially plumage variation, requires further investigation using a more comprehensive geographic sampling from the breeding grounds.
ornithology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?