Abstract:Abstract Land transfer can promote land scale management, realize economies of scale, and improve scale efficiency. Considering the current level of social and economic development, choosing the most appropriate transfer scale can not only increase households’ income but also improve their capability. Based on survey data from rural households in China’s poverty-stricken areas, this paper uses the threshold regression model to analyze the nonlinear relationship between the land transfer-out scale selection and multidimensional poverty. An endogenous switching regression model, which comprehensively considers the bias and heterogeneity of sample selection, is used to analyze the effect of land transfer on multidimensional poverty. The study yields three main findings. First, the effect of transfer-out rate on the multidimensional poverty index (MPI) structurally changes when the rate reaches 0.7667. Second, based on counterfactual assumptions, we find that high transfer-out land scale can effectively reduce the MPI. Third, if high transfer-out scale households (> 0.7667) choose the low scale, the MPI will increase by 0.0378; if low transfer-out scale households (< 0.7667) have the opportunity to choose the high scale, the MPI will drop by 0.1297. Therefore, to achieve better poverty reduction effects in poor areas, policy maker must rationally guide farmers to transfer sufficient land to cross the threshold value for poverty reduction. The government should formulate different guidance strategies for households to transfer out land to improve their capability and avoid falling into multidimensional poverty. Finally, local governments can alleviate multidimensional poverty by increasing support in poor areas and developing the industrial economy.

Transfer-Based Decentralization and Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Transfers-based Decentralization, Local Endowment and Public Employment: A theoretical inquiry and empirical evidence from China

The poverty alleviation effect of transfer payments: evidence from China

Does Poverty Relief Breed Corruption? An Evaluation of China’s Poverty Alleviation Program

Alleviating multi-dimensional poverty through land transfer: Evidence from poverty-stricken villages in China

The Political Economy of Earmarked Transfers in A State-Designated Poor County in Western China: Central Policies and Local Responses

Does land transfer help alleviate relative poverty in China? An analysis based on income and capability perspective

Transfer-based decentralisation, economic growth and spatial inequality: Evidence from China’s 2002–2003 tax sharing reform:

An analysis of the poverty reduction effects on land transfer: Evidence from rural areas in China

Power and Poverty in China: Why Some Counties Perform Better in Poverty Alleviation?

How much land can households transfer out to achieve effective poverty reduction? Empirical evidence from China’s poverty-stricken areas

Central Transfer and Fiscal Capacity in China: Evidence from the Tax-Sharing System

Fiscal Transfers and Expansion of Fiscal Dependents in China's fiscal Recentralization

Can Poverty Be Alleviated in China?

Can Transfer Payment Reduce the Inequality of Compulsory Education in Poor Areas? An Empirical Study Based on the Data from 18 Counties in 6 Provinces in China

Can Land Transfer Alleviate Multidimensional Relative Poverty in Rural Areas?

Information Transparency, Monitoring, and Incentives under Decentralization: Evidence from China's Fiscal Reform of "province Managing County"

Poverty alleviation and rural revitalization: Perspective of fiscal spending and data evidence from 81 Chinese counties

Community-based Development and Poverty Alleviation: an Evaluation of China's Poor Village Investment Program

Taxation without representation: local fiscal response to intergovernmental transfers in China

Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Farmland Transfer-out and Poverty Alleviation in Poverty Areas of China