Abstract:By the end of 2020, China had achieved the goal of eradicating absolute poverty and entered an essential stage of consolidating the achievements of poverty alleviation and promoting rural revitalization. In the future, poverty governance will shift towards relative poverty. Based on the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) database and the propensity score matching model, this paper empirically analyses the alleviating effect of land transfer on relative poverty among rural households. The results show that land transfer can effectively alleviate the multidimensional relative poverty of rural households, and the effect of transferring out land is greater than that of transferring in land. In the future, to improve the land transfer system and promote rural revitalization, it is necessary to actively establish a long-term financial poverty alleviation system in rural areas to ensure a stable income for households that transfer in land, strengthen the construction and regulation of the land transfer market, and further improve the rural social security system to provide comprehensive social security for migrant workers who move to cities and agricultural operators who stay in rural areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper mainly discusses the impact of land transfer on alleviating relative poverty among rural households in China. By using the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) database and the propensity score matching model, the author empirically analyzes the effect of land transfer on alleviating multidimensional relative poverty among rural households. The study finds that land transfer can effectively reduce the multidimensional relative poverty of rural households, with the effect of transferring out land being more significant than transferring in land.
Specifically, from the income perspective, land transfer has activated farmers' land resources, achieved scale operation, reduced high production costs due to land fragmentation, and promoted the transfer of surplus rural labor, optimized labor division, and increased non-agricultural employment opportunities for farmers, thereby increasing their income. From the capability perspective, land transfer not only liberated farmers from their dependence on land but also encouraged them to move to secondary and tertiary industries, improving living conditions and cognitive levels, enhancing non-agricultural employment competitiveness, and improving comprehensive capabilities in education, health, and other aspects.
Furthermore, the paper points out that the mechanisms of alleviating relative poverty through transferring out land and transferring in land are different. Households that transfer out land can obtain stable rental income and choose to engage in non-agricultural industries with higher labor remuneration, optimizing family income structure; while households that transfer in land can obtain policy subsidies through scale operation, improve the level of agricultural mechanization, and increase agricultural operating income.
In summary, the paper verifies two hypotheses: H1: Land transfer helps to alleviate multidimensional relative poverty; H2: There are differences in the effects of transferring out land and transferring in land on alleviating multidimensional relative poverty. This provides a reference for formulating reasonable land transfer policies, consolidating the achievements of poverty alleviation, effectively linking with rural revitalization, and guiding poor households to reasonably alleviate relative poverty.