Abstract:Context: Applicant perceptions of selection methods can affect motivation, performance and withdrawal and may therefore be of relevance in the context of widening access. However, it is unknown how applicant subgroups perceive different selection methods. Objectives: Using organisational justice theory, the present multi-site study examined applicant perceptions of various selection methods, rationales behind perceptions and subgroup differences. Methods: Applicants to five Dutch undergraduate health professions programmes (N = 704) completed an online survey including demographics and a questionnaire on applicant perceptions applied to 11 commonly used selection methods. Applicants rated general favourability and justice dimensions (7-point Likert scale) and could add comments for each method. Results: Descriptive statistics revealed a preference for selection methods on which applicants feel more 'in control': General favourability ratings were highest for curriculum-sampling tests (mean [M] = 5.32) and skills tests (M = 5.13), while weighted lottery (M = 3.05) and unweighted lottery (M = 2.97) were perceived least favourable. Additionally, applicants preferred to distinguish themselves on methods that assess attributes beyond cognitive abilities. Qualitative content analysis of comments revealed several conflicting preferences, including a desire for multiple selection methods versus concerns of experiencing too much stress. Results from a linear mixed model of general favourability indicated some small subgroup differences in perceptions (based on gender, migration background, prior education and parental education), but practical meaning of these differences was negligible. Nevertheless, concerns were expressed that certain selection methods can hinder equitable admission due to inequal access to resources. Conclusions: Our findings illustrate that applicants desire to demonstrate a variety of attributes on a combination of selection tools, but also observe that this can result in multiple drawbacks. The present study can help programmes in deciding which selection methods to include, which more negatively perceived methods should be better justified to applicants, and how to adapt methods to meet applicants' needs.

Towards A Students Admission Selection Approach Using Promethee Ii

Towards A Recommendation Approach For University Program Selection Using Primitive Cognitive Network Process

Automated Matchmaking to Improve Accuracy of Applicant Selection for University Education System

Analysis on the Preference Error Recognition in the Process of Signing up Postgraduate Entrance Examination——Based on the View of Public Department Theory

Department Course Selection Problem: the Primitive Cognitive Network Process Approach

Students' accommodation allocation: A Multicriteria Decision Support System

Probabilistic Linguistic PROMETHEE I and II Methods for Evaluation of the Reform Scheme of Postgraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Talent Training Mode under the Big Data Environment

A Quantitative Analysis of Postgraduate Programmes Admission of the Hong Kong Institute of Education

Fuzzy Decision Support System for ABC University Student Admission Selection

Application of Mathematical Modeling in Multi Criteria Decision Making Process: Intuitionistic Fuzzy PROMETHEE

A PROMETHEE II Approach Based on Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information with Applications to Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making (ICSSE 2020)

Preference Estimation in Deferred Acceptance with Partial School Rankings

Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Penerimaan Siswa Baru

Entrofy Your Cohort: A Data Science Approach to Candidate Selection

The Evaluation of Education Institutes' Performance by Using PROMETHEE

Decision Support System for Assessment of Learning Process Using Simple Additive Weighting

Improving selection procedures in health professions education from the applicant perspective: an interview study

In Holistic Admissions, a Combination of Non-Academic Explanatory Variables Has Significant Predictive Value for Applicant Ranking

Decision support system for employee recruitment optimization

A Multivariate Methodology for Analysing Students' Performance Using Register Data

Applicant perceptions of selection methods for health professions education: Rationales and subgroup differences