Abstract:This paper proposes an approach that combines data envelopment analysis (DEA) with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and conjoint analysis, as multi-criteria decision-making methods to evaluate teachers’ performance in higher education. This process of evaluation is complex as it involves consideration of both objective and subjective efficiency assessments. The efficiency evaluation in the presence of multiple different criteria is done by DEA and results heavily depend on their selection, values, and the weights assigned to them. Objective efficiency evaluation is data-driven, while the subjective efficiency relies on values of subjective criteria usually captured throughout the survey. The conjoint analysis helps with the selection and determining the relative importance of such criteria, based on stakeholder preferences, obtained as an evaluation of experimentally designed hypothetical profiles. An efficient experimental design can be either symmetric or asymmetric depending on the structure of criteria covered by the study. Obtained importance might be a guideline for selecting adequate input and output criteria in the DEA model when assessing teachers’ subjective efficiency. Another reason to use conjoint preferences is to set a basis for weight restrictions in DEA and consequently to increase its discrimination power. Finally, the overall teacher’s efficiency is an AHP aggregation of subjective and objective teaching and research efficiency scores. Given the growing competition in the field of education, a higher level of responsibility and commitment is expected, and it is therefore helpful to identify weaknesses so that they can be addressed. Therefore, the evaluation of teachers’ efficiency at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences illustrates the usage of the proposed approach. As results, relatively efficient and inefficient teachers were identified, the reasons and aspects of their inefficiency were discovered, and rankings were made.

Students' accommodation allocation: A Multicriteria Decision Support System

A roommate problem and room allocation in dormitories using mathematical modeling and multi-attribute decision-making techniques

A Multicriteria Ranking Approach for Evaluating Best Cities for International Students

Web-Based DSS for Resource Allocation in Higher Education

ARAS-H: A ranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria

Decision Support System for Assessment of Learning Process Using Simple Additive Weighting

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan SMA Berbasis Web Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) dan Topsis

Towards A Students Admission Selection Approach Using Promethee Ii

Share-housing Allocation Information Service System Based on Pareto Optimality

A New Multicriteria Decision Making Approach for University Ranking: the Skyline SIR Method.

An Evaluation of Multiple Objective Decision Support Weighting Techniques in Natural Resource Management

QOS and AHP-Based Ranking System for University Campus Dining Halls

A web-based group decision support system for multicriteria ranking problems

Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Simple Ration Analysis Dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa

A Combined Application of SERVQUAL and fuzzy DEMATEL to Evaluate a University's Service Quality

Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation

New approach for a stable multi-criteria ridesharing system

University Employment Quality Evaluation System Based on Multicriteria Decision and Data Analysis

Decision support system for selection technique using MOORA method

Grey Regulatory Focus Theory Weighting Method for the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem in Evaluating University Reputation

Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Teacher Performance in Higher Education