PCN146 - INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY (R/R) ACUTE LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL): ESTABLISHING A VALUE-BASED COST – PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Z. Chen,H. Xiao,V Diaby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.229
IF: 5.156
2018-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:Although the INO-VATE trial showed that inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is associated with better survival outcomes than SOC in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL), InO comes with a high price tag. As a result, the value of this intervention remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value-based drug price of InO in the treatment of patients with R/R ALL, accounting for drug wastage. This study was conducted according to a U.S. Medicare perspective. A Markov model composed of 3 health states: progression-free, progression, and death was developed and populated from multiple sources, including the INO-VATE trial, to evaluate the costs and utilities associated with each treatment regimen. Transition probabilities for the Markov model were derived after the individual patient data reconstruction from published Kaplan-Meier progression-free and death curves (INO-VATE trial). Drug costs, administration costs, adverse events costs, lab and imaging costs were obtained using Medicare reimbursement rates ($ US 2017) and the literature. Baseline health utilities weights were obtained from the INO-VATE trial. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses and drug wastage scenarios were conducted. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for InO compared with SoC were estimated and assessed against benchmark willingness to pay thresholds. The ICER for InO vs SoC was estimated to be 190,829 per QALM under wastage considerations. A threshold analysis established that for InO to be cost-effective considering a WTP of 50,000/QALY, its acquisition should less than $19195 per month. The results of the sensitivity analyses under no wastage considerations suggest that SoC is dominated by InO. Drug wastage has a significant influence on the cost-effectiveness of InO when compared with SoC. Further studies are needed to estimate the value-based price of Ino when hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) costs are considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?